All the mail mirrored from lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	 Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	x86@kernel.org,  Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
	 Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
	 Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	 Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/2] cpu: Fix default mitigation behavior
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 17:05:53 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240420000556.2645001-1-seanjc@google.com> (raw)

Linus, I Cc'd you on this as patch 1 fixes a goof that causes mitigations
to be completely disabled on all !x86 architectures, and it'd be nice to
fix that in rc5.  There was a decent bit of discussion on how exactly to
juggle the Kconfigs, and so I don't expect anyone to include this in a pull
request for rc5.

The discussion didn't fully resolve, i.e. this hasn't gotten a thumbs up
from the affected parties, but I think/hope my approach here is minimal
enough for other architectures (just restores previous behavior), and
shouldn't result in a huge amount of churn if we decide to go in a
different direction.

TL;DR: please grab patch 1 directly if you think it's worth squeezing into
rc5, and isn't completely crazy.

Thanks!


Patch 2 is probably 6.9 material, but is definitely not rc5 material.  It
disallows retroactively enabling mitigations via command line if the kernel
was built with CPU_MITIGATIONS=n, as it's infeasible for x86 to provide
sane, predictable behavior for this scenario.

v2:
 - Rework the Kconfigs so that there's a single user-visible CPU_MITIGATION
   config. [Everyone]
 - Define CPU_MITIGATIONS in arch/Kconfig. [Josh]
 - Completely compile out the cpu_mitigations code if CPU_MITIGATIONS=n,
   e.g. to make impossible to end up in a half-baked state where
   cpu_mitigations ends up enabled but the kernel wasn't compiled with
   mitigations enabled.

v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240417001507.2264512-1-seanjc@google.com

Sean Christopherson (2):
  cpu: Re-enable CPU mitigations by default for !X86 architectures
  cpu: Ignore "mitigations" kernel parameter if CPU_MITIGATIONS=n

 .../admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt         |  3 +++
 arch/Kconfig                                  |  8 ++++++++
 arch/x86/Kconfig                              | 19 ++++++++++++-------
 include/linux/cpu.h                           | 11 +++++++++++
 kernel/cpu.c                                  | 13 ++++++++++---
 5 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)


base-commit: 96fca68c4fbf77a8185eb10f7557e23352732ea2
-- 
2.44.0.769.g3c40516874-goog


             reply	other threads:[~2024-04-20  0:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-20  0:05 Sean Christopherson [this message]
2024-04-20  0:05 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] cpu: Re-enable CPU mitigations by default for !X86 architectures Sean Christopherson
2024-04-24  5:38   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2024-04-25 14:18   ` [tip: x86/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Sean Christopherson
2024-04-20  0:05 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] cpu: Ignore "mitigations" kernel parameter if CPU_MITIGATIONS=n Sean Christopherson
2024-04-20 13:36   ` Borislav Petkov
2024-04-24  5:39   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2024-04-24 13:42     ` Borislav Petkov
2024-04-24 15:48       ` Sean Christopherson
2024-04-25 14:18   ` [tip: x86/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Sean Christopherson
2024-04-20 13:33 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] cpu: Fix default mitigation behavior Borislav Petkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240420000556.2645001-1-seanjc@google.com \
    --to=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.