From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Starke, Daniel" <daniel.starke@siemens.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-security-module <linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] tty: n_gsm: restrict tty devices to attach
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2024 11:02:48 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wjzqaqcicTtWfBtXyytJs1nqjJNved2JFsLVsVLYgVkuQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHk-=wjEZvnn51dhhLqBKUd=cuFhbYA47_OyfUOPB-0zKToL7Q@mail.gmail.com>
On Sat, 20 Apr 2024 at 10:34, Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> Alternatively, we could go the opposite way, and have some flag in the
> line discipline that says "I can be a console", and just check that in
> tty_set_ldisc() for the console.
Actually, I take that back. It's not /dev/console that is the problem,
that just happened to be the one oops I looked at.
Most other normal tty devices just expect ->write() to be called in
normal process context, so if we do a line discipline flag, it would
have to be something like "I'm ok with being called with interrupts
disabled", and then the n_gsm ->open function would just check that.
So it would end up being just another form of that
+ if (tty->ops->set_serial == NULL)
+ return -EINVAL;
check - but maybe more explicit and prettier.
Because a real serial driver might not be ok with it either, if it
uses a semaphore or something.
Whatever. I think the 'set_serial' test would at least be an improvement.
Linus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-20 18:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-20 11:12 [PATCH v2] tty: n_gsm: restrict tty devices to attach Tetsuo Handa
2024-04-20 13:13 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-04-20 17:34 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-04-20 18:02 ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2024-04-20 18:05 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-04-21 13:28 ` Tetsuo Handa
2024-04-21 16:04 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-04-21 17:18 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-04-23 15:26 ` Tetsuo Handa
2024-04-23 16:37 ` Linus Torvalds
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAHk-=wjzqaqcicTtWfBtXyytJs1nqjJNved2JFsLVsVLYgVkuQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=daniel.starke@siemens.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jirislaby@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.