From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 14E14179AB; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 19:45:32 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.137.202.133 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712864734; cv=none; b=eMYMe8p8esrOaDfeQjvfasmmELdh2rw3euMQiVNqdNwWNvCa/I7E8K5pMAf3uDTVwxtwi7fBETM9Uju/VEfGeVAH4Keob9TkcTmcH3Y1Lf8XdMqXM5EhkDlD+/Nei12RjMF2Um7BOmH6uVZyD2P6df03AZncTXICx0VEN5Nj2ik= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712864734; c=relaxed/simple; bh=v/kg2zBgjouqNayyfTZ1gQRpaCtsWdHXcAeRYRi8jSc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=c/C0StsHFU9gn6cbnUAiuarWHeNJKZHzZh0nh5/YlN/wuYIJaD0LreWV64zvda5Cp6RcZNbWVKl7kdEATl7Y/cqTC8udR0Mh6ONJkAOQmyEnH3+1Jxv1UCPEqV1sWl+Ui4cxqwfwDmp1uUvG7UiYuWqrPIqlY6J9sYVRCwuaSko= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=infradead.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b=LW4B+RA/; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.137.202.133 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="LW4B+RA/" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=mF3LgyonzoPiLPggKtlEjI/RAYj7UYB9rpei5Ud65w4=; b=LW4B+RA/mLBikoIkjpMDpYn9oP u2YAB5xmL1D4XkoUv1Ve9gQEIQ0TAvvtWmZldKRQqHURClp6PnA6zwtnlpDI5YcucnvadEV7WunWR b/1Iq8vVt1oArh5tcqicc9Z63IyQeyuWCw9WE0oR/Ok86B2YT082t2bjkyb27tRD8lbretuG1UYwR NEF+joRqo6rwX3adbENZeQaNQlnWdEzjPCwZa5i/q7E286YXArA3Jy82X/wR+QDg69SZaiPqn91EB VhUQK10NXrl7tuNE0LjnU4cJYOYOYsXm/2EOsZ/Hcy9WT5WMB3gVzJ0tiJjB3LXt+twOTdZqPWpdj bhUwFHXw==; Received: from mcgrof by bombadil.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1rv0MS-0000000DwB9-3meA; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 19:45:28 +0000 Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 12:45:28 -0700 From: Luis Chamberlain To: Mike Rapoport , Thomas Gleixner Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alexandre Ghiti , Andrew Morton , =?iso-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn_T=F6pel?= , Catalin Marinas , Christophe Leroy , "David S. Miller" , Dinh Nguyen , Donald Dutile , Eric Chanudet , Heiko Carstens , Helge Deller , Huacai Chen , Kent Overstreet , Mark Rutland , Michael Ellerman , Nadav Amit , Palmer Dabbelt , Puranjay Mohan , Rick Edgecombe , Russell King , Song Liu , Steven Rostedt , Thomas Bogendoerfer , Will Deacon , bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-modules@vger.kernel.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, loongarch@lists.linux.dev, netdev@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/15] mm: jit/text allocator Message-ID: References: <20240411160051.2093261-1-rppt@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240411160051.2093261-1-rppt@kernel.org> Sender: Luis Chamberlain On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 07:00:36PM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote: > From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" > > Hi, > > Since v3 I looked into making execmem more of an utility toolbox, as we > discussed at LPC with Mark Rutland, but it was getting more hairier than > having a struct describing architecture constraints and a type identifying > the consumer of execmem. > > And I do think that having the description of architecture constraints for > allocations of executable memory in a single place is better that having it > spread all over the place. > > The patches available via git: > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rppt/linux.git/log/?h=execmem/v4 I've taken the first 5 patches through modules-next for now to get early exposure to testing. Of those I just had minor nit feedback on the 5th, but the rest look good. Let's wait for review for the rest of the patches 6-15. Luis From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 177B3C4345F for ; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 19:45:39 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=EpfN6Qa5i8g9VZCdeZxyLI2+ZuO/9wwYRs7eigEcIsk=; b=YLAOqvIYeHrrhw Z32wrbJfYJARaAIapqGKQz4W5QNuhxhOx9s8UUtMPlNXXqsNoKHwxMQn6rfMVsYL1cKYVCNsOOUap pkxGyC1ribvxg4av/c1RDlrm9N7gVIYLH8BeEoATXWi74wCBNWrRm4jZldfJqd4qWyG+iE6lhNrh4 nVArObeoFWcFL8npWzn0TTVvu4A8LRfNxE55eLUmPVqUvTakpbzhMGE0Yu4XQicIR07XCvGoYMtHK bKyarRCYJbRjMs7A9mAbe4Rg16P/TFsJwwnlfmOB1O8NTgl2V0enk41xvuIXLW96n4Da6/86/DJP/ NiPMi/zQzVFXjFXu5h5Q==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1rv0MY-0000000DwCN-2EQM; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 19:45:34 +0000 Received: from mcgrof by bombadil.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1rv0MS-0000000DwB9-3meA; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 19:45:28 +0000 Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 12:45:28 -0700 From: Luis Chamberlain To: Mike Rapoport , Thomas Gleixner Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alexandre Ghiti , Andrew Morton , =?iso-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn_T=F6pel?= , Catalin Marinas , Christophe Leroy , "David S. Miller" , Dinh Nguyen , Donald Dutile , Eric Chanudet , Heiko Carstens , Helge Deller , Huacai Chen , Kent Overstreet , Mark Rutland , Michael Ellerman , Nadav Amit , Palmer Dabbelt , Puranjay Mohan , Rick Edgecombe , Russell King , Song Liu , Steven Rostedt , Thomas Bogendoerfer , Will Deacon , bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-modules@vger.kernel.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, loongarch@lists.linux.dev, netdev@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/15] mm: jit/text allocator Message-ID: References: <20240411160051.2093261-1-rppt@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240411160051.2093261-1-rppt@kernel.org> X-BeenThere: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-riscv" Errors-To: linux-riscv-bounces+linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 07:00:36PM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote: > From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" > > Hi, > > Since v3 I looked into making execmem more of an utility toolbox, as we > discussed at LPC with Mark Rutland, but it was getting more hairier than > having a struct describing architecture constraints and a type identifying > the consumer of execmem. > > And I do think that having the description of architecture constraints for > allocations of executable memory in a single place is better that having it > spread all over the place. > > The patches available via git: > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rppt/linux.git/log/?h=execmem/v4 I've taken the first 5 patches through modules-next for now to get early exposure to testing. Of those I just had minor nit feedback on the 5th, but the rest look good. Let's wait for review for the rest of the patches 6-15. Luis _______________________________________________ linux-riscv mailing list linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EDA49C00A94 for ; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 19:45:44 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=Alns+3YLxfEIEEW3zDjId0jApNcDiD04I9hjVVVm5Lw=; b=hDqYrXRz26J0Xy 5MDBGRA1rKUJemT1M67lMm6eV5S8w17sN9z99cI3vk3EoIMghD7wMkQBuBkqEekkMwzYNELTGXBRD PJFL3BC2MZv1jX47oZZ/v6VNmn+3swIYihmqZNas0vKZfd2eaq3E9uisokiSrOXy8DewkOaPh0igX kYa+owYt2pez/MsriVNPU4g/XVxxeH5i7vP48XXNVG4Cd/Ee+pIo+45L1bL2aVQDRjtxmWlHhQL2C HKbWZqVaoDJXIpYwTBk/y2gCDeufm94kJ6k9KLP4YDSCvKDkiXUKD5pMs6ymunK1U77lOEXIcBxy6 s+SUfOTuDENgGXviSZqg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1rv0MX-0000000DwBz-2zNT; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 19:45:33 +0000 Received: from mcgrof by bombadil.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1rv0MS-0000000DwB9-3meA; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 19:45:28 +0000 Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 12:45:28 -0700 From: Luis Chamberlain To: Mike Rapoport , Thomas Gleixner Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alexandre Ghiti , Andrew Morton , =?iso-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn_T=F6pel?= , Catalin Marinas , Christophe Leroy , "David S. Miller" , Dinh Nguyen , Donald Dutile , Eric Chanudet , Heiko Carstens , Helge Deller , Huacai Chen , Kent Overstreet , Mark Rutland , Michael Ellerman , Nadav Amit , Palmer Dabbelt , Puranjay Mohan , Rick Edgecombe , Russell King , Song Liu , Steven Rostedt , Thomas Bogendoerfer , Will Deacon , bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-modules@vger.kernel.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, loongarch@lists.linux.dev, netdev@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/15] mm: jit/text allocator Message-ID: References: <20240411160051.2093261-1-rppt@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240411160051.2093261-1-rppt@kernel.org> X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 07:00:36PM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote: > From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" > > Hi, > > Since v3 I looked into making execmem more of an utility toolbox, as we > discussed at LPC with Mark Rutland, but it was getting more hairier than > having a struct describing architecture constraints and a type identifying > the consumer of execmem. > > And I do think that having the description of architecture constraints for > allocations of executable memory in a single place is better that having it > spread all over the place. > > The patches available via git: > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rppt/linux.git/log/?h=execmem/v4 I've taken the first 5 patches through modules-next for now to get early exposure to testing. Of those I just had minor nit feedback on the 5th, but the rest look good. Let's wait for review for the rest of the patches 6-15. Luis _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 71696C4345F for ; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 19:46:23 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; secure) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=bombadil.20210309 header.b=LW4B+RA/; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4VFqvL0rnWz3vYy for ; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 05:46:22 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; secure) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=bombadil.20210309 header.b=LW4B+RA/; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=none (no SPF record) smtp.mailfrom=infradead.org (client-ip=2607:7c80:54:3::133; helo=bombadil.infradead.org; envelope-from=mcgrof@infradead.org; receiver=lists.ozlabs.org) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [IPv6:2607:7c80:54:3::133]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4VFqtY4s6sz2y71 for ; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 05:45:41 +1000 (AEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=mF3LgyonzoPiLPggKtlEjI/RAYj7UYB9rpei5Ud65w4=; b=LW4B+RA/mLBikoIkjpMDpYn9oP u2YAB5xmL1D4XkoUv1Ve9gQEIQ0TAvvtWmZldKRQqHURClp6PnA6zwtnlpDI5YcucnvadEV7WunWR b/1Iq8vVt1oArh5tcqicc9Z63IyQeyuWCw9WE0oR/Ok86B2YT082t2bjkyb27tRD8lbretuG1UYwR NEF+joRqo6rwX3adbENZeQaNQlnWdEzjPCwZa5i/q7E286YXArA3Jy82X/wR+QDg69SZaiPqn91EB VhUQK10NXrl7tuNE0LjnU4cJYOYOYsXm/2EOsZ/Hcy9WT5WMB3gVzJ0tiJjB3LXt+twOTdZqPWpdj bhUwFHXw==; Received: from mcgrof by bombadil.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1rv0MS-0000000DwB9-3meA; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 19:45:28 +0000 Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 12:45:28 -0700 From: Luis Chamberlain To: Mike Rapoport , Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/15] mm: jit/text allocator Message-ID: References: <20240411160051.2093261-1-rppt@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240411160051.2093261-1-rppt@kernel.org> X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Mark Rutland , x86@kernel.org, Catalin Marinas , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, Song Liu , Donald Dutile , sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, Nadav Amit , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Helge Deller , Huacai Chen , Russell King , linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alexandre Ghiti , Will Deacon , Heiko Carstens , Steven Rostedt , loongarch@lists.linux.dev, bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Thomas Bogendoerfer , linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, Puranjay Mohan , linux-mm@kvack.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Kent Overstreet , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Dinh Nguyen , =?iso-88 59-1?Q?Bj=F6rn_T=F6pel?= , Eric Chanudet , Palmer Dabbelt , Andrew Morton , Rick Edgecombe , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, "David S. Miller" , linux-modules@vger.kernel.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 07:00:36PM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote: > From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" > > Hi, > > Since v3 I looked into making execmem more of an utility toolbox, as we > discussed at LPC with Mark Rutland, but it was getting more hairier than > having a struct describing architecture constraints and a type identifying > the consumer of execmem. > > And I do think that having the description of architecture constraints for > allocations of executable memory in a single place is better that having it > spread all over the place. > > The patches available via git: > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rppt/linux.git/log/?h=execmem/v4 I've taken the first 5 patches through modules-next for now to get early exposure to testing. Of those I just had minor nit feedback on the 5th, but the rest look good. Let's wait for review for the rest of the patches 6-15. Luis