LKML Archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lance Yang <ioworker0@gmail.com>
To: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, willy@infradead.org, sj@kernel.org,
	 maskray@google.com, ziy@nvidia.com, ryan.roberts@arm.com,
	david@redhat.com,  21cnbao@gmail.com, mhocko@suse.com,
	fengwei.yin@intel.com, zokeefe@google.com,  shy828301@gmail.com,
	xiehuan09@gmail.com, libang.li@antgroup.com,
	 wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com, songmuchun@bytedance.com,
	peterx@redhat.com,  minchan@kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v5 4/4] mm/vmscan: avoid split lazyfree THP during shrink_folio_list()
Date: Tue, 14 May 2024 16:36:42 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAK1f24nUvOui=-v8VBZz8B_8HqXF0Yoo-JibvSXu_ab+rsW=ow@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c8f52a60-94a4-48cc-be0c-824b26956934@linux.alibaba.com>

Hi Baolin,

Thanks for taking time to review!


On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 3:09 PM Baolin Wang
<baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2024/5/13 15:47, Lance Yang wrote:
> > When the user no longer requires the pages, they would use
> > madvise(MADV_FREE) to mark the pages as lazy free. Subsequently, they
> > typically would not re-write to that memory again.
> >
> > During memory reclaim, if we detect that the large folio and its PMD are
> > both still marked as clean and there are no unexpected references
> > (such as GUP), so we can just discard the memory lazily, improving the
> > efficiency of memory reclamation in this case.
> >
> > On an Intel i5 CPU, reclaiming 1GiB of lazyfree THPs using
> > mem_cgroup_force_empty() results in the following runtimes in seconds
> > (shorter is better):
> >
> > --------------------------------------------
> > |     Old       |      New       |  Change  |
> > --------------------------------------------
> > |   0.683426    |    0.049197    |  -92.80% |
> > --------------------------------------------
> >
> > Suggested-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
> > Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Lance Yang <ioworker0@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >   include/linux/huge_mm.h |  9 +++++
> >   mm/huge_memory.c        | 75 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >   mm/rmap.c               | 31 ++++++++++-------
> >   3 files changed, 103 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/huge_mm.h b/include/linux/huge_mm.h
> > index 9fcb0b0b6ed1..cfd7ec2b6d0a 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/huge_mm.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/huge_mm.h
> > @@ -411,6 +411,8 @@ static inline bool thp_migration_supported(void)
> >
> >   void split_huge_pmd_locked(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,
> >                          pmd_t *pmd, bool freeze, struct folio *folio);
> > +bool unmap_huge_pmd_locked(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr,
> > +                        pmd_t *pmdp, struct folio *folio);
> >
> >   #else /* CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE */
> >
> > @@ -478,6 +480,13 @@ static inline void split_huge_pmd_locked(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> >                                        unsigned long address, pmd_t *pmd,
> >                                        bool freeze, struct folio *folio) {}
> >
> > +static inline bool unmap_huge_pmd_locked(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> > +                                      unsigned long addr, pmd_t *pmdp,
> > +                                      struct folio *folio)
> > +{
> > +     return false;
> > +}
> > +
> >   #define split_huge_pud(__vma, __pmd, __address)     \
> >       do { } while (0)
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
> > index 425272c6c50b..3ceeeb2f42d4 100644
> > --- a/mm/huge_memory.c
> > +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
> > @@ -2687,6 +2687,81 @@ static void unmap_folio(struct folio *folio)
> >       try_to_unmap_flush();
> >   }
> >
> > +static bool __discard_trans_pmd_locked(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> > +                                    unsigned long addr, pmd_t *pmdp,
> > +                                    struct folio *folio)
> > +{
> > +     struct mm_struct *mm = vma->vm_mm;
> > +     int ref_count, map_count;
> > +     pmd_t orig_pmd = *pmdp;
> > +     struct mmu_gather tlb;
> > +     struct page *page;
> > +
> > +     if (pmd_dirty(orig_pmd) || folio_test_dirty(folio))
> > +             return false;
> > +     if (unlikely(!pmd_present(orig_pmd) || !pmd_trans_huge(orig_pmd)))
> > +             return false;
> > +
> > +     page = pmd_page(orig_pmd);
> > +     if (unlikely(page_folio(page) != folio))
> > +             return false;
>
> The function is called under the ptl lock, so I have no idea why the pmd
> value can be changed, seems above validation is useless.

Yep. For the page reclaim path, page_vma_mapped_walk() will require
the PTL, and make sure the PMD mapping is unchanged via check_pmd().

But, IMO, we cannot assume that all callers always do the PMD mapping
check. I suggest keeping it to prepare for corner cases :)

>
> > +
> > +     tlb_gather_mmu(&tlb, mm);
>
> You missed tlb_finish_mmu() to do tlb flushing, and ...

Good spot!

>
> > +     orig_pmd = pmdp_huge_get_and_clear(mm, addr, pmdp);
> > +     tlb_remove_pmd_tlb_entry(&tlb, pmdp, addr);
>
> I don't think tlb gather is helpful here, since you just flush one PMD
> entry. Just using pmdp_huge_clear_flush() seems enough.

Nice, thanks for the suggestion!

I completely agree that using pmdp_huge_clear_flush() is sufficient here :)

>
> > +
> > +     /*
> > +      * Syncing against concurrent GUP-fast:
> > +      * - clear PMD; barrier; read refcount
> > +      * - inc refcount; barrier; read PMD
> > +      */
> > +     smp_mb();
> > +
> > +     ref_count = folio_ref_count(folio);
> > +     map_count = folio_mapcount(folio);
> > +
> > +     /*
> > +      * Order reads for folio refcount and dirty flag
> > +      * (see comments in __remove_mapping()).
> > +      */
> > +     smp_rmb();
> > +
> > +     /*
> > +      * If the PMD or folio is redirtied at this point, or if there are
> > +      * unexpected references, we will give up to discard this folio
> > +      * and remap it.
> > +      *
> > +      * The only folio refs must be one from isolation plus the rmap(s).
> > +      */
> > +     if (ref_count != map_count + 1 || folio_test_dirty(folio) ||
> > +         pmd_dirty(orig_pmd)) {
> > +             set_pmd_at(mm, addr, pmdp, orig_pmd);
>
> Should we also call 'folio_set_swapbacked()' if the folio was redirtied?

Yes. I forgot about that :)

Thanks again for the review!
Lance

>
> > +             return false;
> > +     }
> > +
> > +     folio_remove_rmap_pmd(folio, page, vma);
> > +     zap_deposited_table(mm, pmdp);
> > +     add_mm_counter(mm, MM_ANONPAGES, -HPAGE_PMD_NR);
> > +     if (vma->vm_flags & VM_LOCKED)
> > +             mlock_drain_local();
> > +     folio_put(folio);
> > +
> > +     return true;
> > +}
> > +
> > +bool unmap_huge_pmd_locked(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr,
> > +                        pmd_t *pmdp, struct folio *folio)
> > +{
> > +     VM_WARN_ON_FOLIO(!folio_test_pmd_mappable(folio), folio);
> > +     VM_WARN_ON_FOLIO(!folio_test_locked(folio), folio);
> > +     VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(!IS_ALIGNED(addr, HPAGE_PMD_SIZE));
> > +
> > +     if (folio_test_anon(folio) && !folio_test_swapbacked(folio))
> > +             return __discard_trans_pmd_locked(vma, addr, pmdp, folio);
> > +
> > +     return false;
> > +}
> > +
> >   static void remap_page(struct folio *folio, unsigned long nr)
> >   {
> >       int i = 0;
> > diff --git a/mm/rmap.c b/mm/rmap.c
> > index 08a93347f283..e09f2141b8dc 100644
> > --- a/mm/rmap.c
> > +++ b/mm/rmap.c
> > @@ -1677,18 +1677,25 @@ static bool try_to_unmap_one(struct folio *folio, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> >                       goto walk_done_err;
> >               }
> >
> > -             if (!pvmw.pte && (flags & TTU_SPLIT_HUGE_PMD)) {
> > -                     /*
> > -                      * We temporarily have to drop the PTL and start once
> > -                      * again from that now-PTE-mapped page table.
> > -                      */
> > -                     split_huge_pmd_locked(vma, range.start, pvmw.pmd, false,
> > -                                           folio);
> > -                     pvmw.pmd = NULL;
> > -                     spin_unlock(pvmw.ptl);
> > -                     pvmw.ptl = NULL;
> > -                     flags &= ~TTU_SPLIT_HUGE_PMD;
> > -                     continue;
> > +             if (!pvmw.pte) {
> > +                     if (unmap_huge_pmd_locked(vma, range.start, pvmw.pmd,
> > +                                               folio))
> > +                             goto walk_done;
> > +
> > +                     if (flags & TTU_SPLIT_HUGE_PMD) {
> > +                             /*
> > +                              * We temporarily have to drop the PTL and start
> > +                              * once again from that now-PTE-mapped page
> > +                              * table.
> > +                              */
> > +                             split_huge_pmd_locked(vma, range.start,
> > +                                                   pvmw.pmd, false, folio);
> > +                             pvmw.pmd = NULL;
> > +                             spin_unlock(pvmw.ptl);
> > +                             pvmw.ptl = NULL;
> > +                             flags &= ~TTU_SPLIT_HUGE_PMD;
> > +                             continue;
> > +                     }
> >               }
> >
> >               /* Unexpected PMD-mapped THP? */

      reply	other threads:[~2024-05-14  8:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-05-13  7:47 [PATCH RESEND v5 0/4] Reclaim lazyfree THP without splitting Lance Yang
2024-05-13  7:47 ` [PATCH RESEND v5 1/4] mm/rmap: remove duplicated exit code in pagewalk loop Lance Yang
2024-05-14  6:26   ` Baolin Wang
2024-05-14  7:43     ` Lance Yang
2024-05-13  7:47 ` [PATCH RESEND v5 2/4] mm/rmap: integrate PMD-mapped folio splitting into " Lance Yang
2024-05-13  7:47 ` [PATCH RESEND v5 3/4] mm/mlock: check for THP missing the mlock in try_to_unmap_one() Lance Yang
2024-05-14  6:41   ` Baolin Wang
2024-05-14  7:46     ` Lance Yang
2024-05-13  7:47 ` [PATCH RESEND v5 4/4] mm/vmscan: avoid split lazyfree THP during shrink_folio_list() Lance Yang
2024-05-14  7:09   ` Baolin Wang
2024-05-14  8:36     ` Lance Yang [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAK1f24nUvOui=-v8VBZz8B_8HqXF0Yoo-JibvSXu_ab+rsW=ow@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=ioworker0@gmail.com \
    --cc=21cnbao@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=fengwei.yin@intel.com \
    --cc=libang.li@antgroup.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=maskray@google.com \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=minchan@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=shy828301@gmail.com \
    --cc=sj@kernel.org \
    --cc=songmuchun@bytedance.com \
    --cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=xiehuan09@gmail.com \
    --cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
    --cc=zokeefe@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).