* Regression of e1000e (I219-LM) from 6.1.90 to 6.6.30
@ 2024-05-13 8:42 Bagas Sanjaya
2024-05-13 17:17 ` Andrew Lunn
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Bagas Sanjaya @ 2024-05-13 8:42 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Linux Regressions, Linux Networking,
intel-wired-lan
Cc: Jesse Brandeburg, Tony Nguyen, David S. Miller, Eric Dumazet,
Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, lukas.probsthain
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1442 bytes --]
Hi,
<lukas.probsthain@googlemail.com> reported on Bugzilla
(https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218826) regression on his Thinkpad
T480 with Intel I219-LM:
> After updating from kernel version 6.1.90 to 6.6.30, the e1000e driver exhibits a regression on a Lenovo Thinkpad T480 with an Intel I219-LM Ethernet controller. The system experiences a freeze when an Ethernet cable is plugged in. The issue is not present in the previous kernel version 6.1.90.
>
> System Information:
> - Model: Lenovo Thinkpad T480
> - BIOS Version: N24ET76W (1.51) dated 02/27/2024
> - Ethernet Controller: Intel Corporation Ethernet Connection (4) I219-LM (rev 21)
> - Kernel Module in Use: e1000e
> - Operating System: Manjaro Linux, kernel version 6.6.30-1
>
> Steps to Reproduce:
> 1. Boot system with kernel version 6.6.30.
> 2. Connect the Ethernet cable to the laptop.
> 3. Observe that the system freezes.
>
> Expected Behavior:
> The system should remain stable and maintain network connectivity without freezing when the Ethernet cable is connected.
>
> Actual Behavior:
> The system freezes immediately upon plugging in the Ethernet cable.
>
> Additional Information:
> The regression seems to be introduced in one of the updates between kernel versions 6.1.90 and 6.6.30. The issue does not occur with the older kernel version 6.1.90.
Thanks.
--
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Regression of e1000e (I219-LM) from 6.1.90 to 6.6.30
2024-05-13 8:42 Regression of e1000e (I219-LM) from 6.1.90 to 6.6.30 Bagas Sanjaya
@ 2024-05-13 17:17 ` Andrew Lunn
2024-05-14 4:34 ` Bagas Sanjaya
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Lunn @ 2024-05-13 17:17 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Bagas Sanjaya
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Linux Regressions, Linux Networking,
intel-wired-lan, Jesse Brandeburg, Tony Nguyen, David S. Miller,
Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, lukas.probsthain
On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 03:42:50PM +0700, Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
> Hi,
>
> <lukas.probsthain@googlemail.com> reported on Bugzilla
> (https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218826) regression on his Thinkpad
> T480 with Intel I219-LM:
>
> > After updating from kernel version 6.1.90 to 6.6.30, the e1000e driver exhibits a regression on a Lenovo Thinkpad T480 with an Intel I219-LM Ethernet controller.
Could you try a git bisect between these two kernel versions? You
might be able to limit it to drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e, which
only had around 15 patches.
Andrew
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Regression of e1000e (I219-LM) from 6.1.90 to 6.6.30
2024-05-13 17:17 ` Andrew Lunn
@ 2024-05-14 4:34 ` Bagas Sanjaya
2024-05-14 9:48 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Bagas Sanjaya @ 2024-05-14 4:34 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Andrew Lunn
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Linux Regressions, Linux Networking,
intel-wired-lan, Jesse Brandeburg, Tony Nguyen, David S. Miller,
Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, lukas.probsthain
On 5/14/24 00:17, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 03:42:50PM +0700, Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> <lukas.probsthain@googlemail.com> reported on Bugzilla
>> (https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218826) regression on his Thinkpad
>> T480 with Intel I219-LM:
>>
>>> After updating from kernel version 6.1.90 to 6.6.30, the e1000e driver exhibits a regression on a Lenovo Thinkpad T480 with an Intel I219-LM Ethernet controller.
>
> Could you try a git bisect between these two kernel versions? You
> might be able to limit it to drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e, which
> only had around 15 patches.
>
The BZ reporter (Cc'ed) says that bisection is in progress. You may
want to log in to BZ to reach him.
Thanks.
--
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Regression of e1000e (I219-LM) from 6.1.90 to 6.6.30
2024-05-14 4:34 ` Bagas Sanjaya
@ 2024-05-14 9:48 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Thorsten Leemhuis @ 2024-05-14 9:48 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Bagas Sanjaya, Andrew Lunn
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Linux Regressions, Linux Networking,
intel-wired-lan, Jesse Brandeburg, Tony Nguyen, David S. Miller,
Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, lukas.probsthain
On 14.05.24 06:34, Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
> On 5/14/24 00:17, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>> On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 03:42:50PM +0700, Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
>>>
>>> <lukas.probsthain@googlemail.com> reported on Bugzilla
>>> (https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218826) regression on his Thinkpad
>>> T480 with Intel I219-LM:
Bagas, why did you start forwarding these bugs by mail yourself again
after we had agreed you forward them to me, so I can handle it from there?
Yes, you forwarded that particular bug to me a few days ago and I didn't
do anything. But that was on purpose: I usually wait at least two
working days before doing so, as some subsystem are active in bugzilla
and might feel annoyed by starting a separate thread on the mailing list.
Side note: you also apparently make it not obvious enough that you are
just forwarding the bug, as both here and in the other bug your
forwarded today the developer apparently thought it was a bug you face.
Please lets avoid all of that again and switch back to the model we
agreed on a few months ago.
>>>> After updating from kernel version 6.1.90 to 6.6.30, the e1000e driver exhibits a regression on a Lenovo Thinkpad T480 with an Intel I219-LM Ethernet controller.
>>
>> Could you try a git bisect between these two kernel versions? You
>> might be able to limit it to drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e, which
>> only had around 15 patches.
>
> The BZ reporter (Cc'ed) says that bisection is in progress. You may
> want to log in to BZ to reach him.
Side note: you should not assume every developer has a BZ account (or is
willing to create one).
Ciao, Thorsten
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-05-14 9:48 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-05-13 8:42 Regression of e1000e (I219-LM) from 6.1.90 to 6.6.30 Bagas Sanjaya
2024-05-13 17:17 ` Andrew Lunn
2024-05-14 4:34 ` Bagas Sanjaya
2024-05-14 9:48 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).