From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from localhost (dcvr.yhbt.net [127.0.0.1]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CA871F4B4; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 17:47:55 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2021 17:47:55 +0000 From: Eric Wong To: Xiao Yu Cc: Arkadi Colson , cmogstored-public@yhbt.net Subject: Re: Segfaults on http_close? Message-ID: <20210125174755.GA30378@dcvr> References: <20210111212621.GA12555@dcvr> <20210117095109.GA28219@dcvr> <20210120085745.GB29704@dcvr> <20210120212229.GA25024@dcvr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: Xiao Yu wrote: > On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 9:22 PM Eric Wong wrote: > > Xiao Yu wrote: > > > That's good to know, would it help if I applied the patch and then > > > compiled with the older compiler to check? > > > > Yes, that would be tremendously helpful, thanks. > > > > > Would non-daemonized mode and capturing stderr provide more verbosity? > > We've been running the patched version compiled with the older GCC for > a couple days now and so far so good and hopefully I can provide more > details if it does crash again in the future. Thanks again for all > your help! No problem and thanks for the update! Any thoughts on whether I should release 1.8.1 with the patch soon or maybe wait a bit longer?