From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH ORPHANED] profiling: Remove create_prof_cpu_mask().
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2024 15:27:58 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0be742a5-bfe5-489b-8ceb-efd99306bdcd@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> (raw)
create_prof_cpu_mask() is no longer used after commit 1f44a225777e ("s390:
convert interrupt handling to use generic hardirq").
Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
---
Since nobody can respond, sending to Linus, as per "THE REST" rule
in MAINTAINERS file.
include/linux/profile.h | 5 -----
kernel/profile.c | 43 -----------------------------------------
2 files changed, 48 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/profile.h b/include/linux/profile.h
index 11db1ec516e2..04ae5ebcb637 100644
--- a/include/linux/profile.h
+++ b/include/linux/profile.h
@@ -18,13 +18,8 @@ struct proc_dir_entry;
struct notifier_block;
#if defined(CONFIG_PROFILING) && defined(CONFIG_PROC_FS)
-void create_prof_cpu_mask(void);
int create_proc_profile(void);
#else
-static inline void create_prof_cpu_mask(void)
-{
-}
-
static inline int create_proc_profile(void)
{
return 0;
diff --git a/kernel/profile.c b/kernel/profile.c
index 7575747e2ac6..1a6c1cf98485 100644
--- a/kernel/profile.c
+++ b/kernel/profile.c
@@ -342,49 +342,6 @@ void profile_tick(int type)
#include <linux/seq_file.h>
#include <linux/uaccess.h>
-static int prof_cpu_mask_proc_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
-{
- seq_printf(m, "%*pb\n", cpumask_pr_args(prof_cpu_mask));
- return 0;
-}
-
-static int prof_cpu_mask_proc_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
-{
- return single_open(file, prof_cpu_mask_proc_show, NULL);
-}
-
-static ssize_t prof_cpu_mask_proc_write(struct file *file,
- const char __user *buffer, size_t count, loff_t *pos)
-{
- cpumask_var_t new_value;
- int err;
-
- if (!zalloc_cpumask_var(&new_value, GFP_KERNEL))
- return -ENOMEM;
-
- err = cpumask_parse_user(buffer, count, new_value);
- if (!err) {
- cpumask_copy(prof_cpu_mask, new_value);
- err = count;
- }
- free_cpumask_var(new_value);
- return err;
-}
-
-static const struct proc_ops prof_cpu_mask_proc_ops = {
- .proc_open = prof_cpu_mask_proc_open,
- .proc_read = seq_read,
- .proc_lseek = seq_lseek,
- .proc_release = single_release,
- .proc_write = prof_cpu_mask_proc_write,
-};
-
-void create_prof_cpu_mask(void)
-{
- /* create /proc/irq/prof_cpu_mask */
- proc_create("irq/prof_cpu_mask", 0600, NULL, &prof_cpu_mask_proc_ops);
-}
-
/*
* This function accesses profiling information. The returned data is
* binary: the sampling step and the actual contents of the profile
--
2.18.4
reply other threads:[~2024-04-27 6:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0be742a5-bfe5-489b-8ceb-efd99306bdcd@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
--to=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.