From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753616Ab0LaOlZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 Dec 2010 09:41:25 -0500 Received: from shadbolt.e.decadent.org.uk ([88.96.1.126]:56547 "EHLO shadbolt.e.decadent.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752807Ab0LaOlY (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 Dec 2010 09:41:24 -0500 From: Ben Hutchings To: Krzysztof Halasa Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Kernel Testers List , Maciej Rutecki , Florian Mickler In-Reply-To: References: <96DQe4a_2tH.A.4RE.497GNB@chimera> <201012301545.15667.rjw@sisk.pl> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-3WouH82J6WMWfUvMN0bF" Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2010 14:40:47 +0000 Message-ID: <1293806447.2870.36.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 192.168.4.185 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ben@decadent.org.uk Subject: Re: [Bug #25442] ixp4xx defines FREQ macro; conflicts with gspca/ov519 driver X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:14:11 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on shadbolt.decadent.org.uk) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --=-3WouH82J6WMWfUvMN0bF Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 2010-12-31 at 15:08 +0100, Krzysztof Halasa wrote: > "Rafael J. Wysocki" writes: >=20 > >> This FREQ has been there for years. Not that it makes it smart, and > >> I'll obviously send Ben's patch upstream for 2.6.38. Still processing > >> incoming mail queue :-( > > > > Well, the patch is in the mainline, which is why it's still listed. >=20 > s/is/isn't/ I assume. >=20 > I was referring to the "regression" thing only, i.e. there is no any > regression here, AFAIK at least. There is a regression for the ov519 driver on ixp4xx. Ben. --=20 Ben Hutchings Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse. --=-3WouH82J6WMWfUvMN0bF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iQIVAwUATR3rbee/yOyVhhEJAQI4cQ//Wip3xNzlQpAPI+H1H8dAoMXNn7vXWrfw /nc4JmIHlxr0yZxpeqivCRO35Pxu/XMrxe4d758LWWYiSWsjHo4uh17lmI+O3/H9 lVbwsb/M+wHlBufBwQBG5OXFAfbTWV2IzYYc3QiZy2px0dkGAFoxw2VviK/ICAAk oIUB7dYZDm9KrIg9DCT+kWjvAiRVAi0tM0piIXnvvmwofqtQoTb0VYMu96hff/ue StBNay0ZEPCXlLZcdMcFMdatyvR8ji2Iauwr5DOT+uGl4kEvYDl2FHz7hjEaoNIp F7bFia2IGGp05uIUZ0Hv7w2omNg7txuvooXVtUa2G9dqWTcjXCU6rwAfiGxWPMzH jUZihed6rp1gfIi6ML3FkKgBFKUTd2isX/tTA7VEFYRH70+/TkjWFzQDYvjcxGQJ fx/8r6lbHHEIl8MrRrSRDKEZG+KMMgSLKYmkHBudnEY7YVb0f3uQO7Vc1c7AHoRy A7l5AeRtgl0dgwDO0hknSsvBMuMqqtrWupaYt/9EfGhltYWANsudyXMU7krYVJWo scuPpGrqTVaEBwEoZx9R/4KYtQrKuIjf4BvNlpqvTarXhguO9ujn3yxKZM4l6aAd FaV3Pk7451dm2YF13e/i1Eh+Urppn4nPohZgO8K5Uo0FvcTHBZK1JRsIEXE2XSzx qbukk+DDYs0= =OqBa -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-3WouH82J6WMWfUvMN0bF-- From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ben Hutchings Subject: Re: [Bug #25442] ixp4xx defines FREQ macro; conflicts with gspca/ov519 driver Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2010 14:40:47 +0000 Message-ID: <1293806447.2870.36.camel@localhost> References: <96DQe4a_2tH.A.4RE.497GNB@chimera> <201012301545.15667.rjw@sisk.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-3WouH82J6WMWfUvMN0bF" Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: kernel-testers-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: To: Krzysztof Halasa Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Kernel Testers List , Maciej Rutecki , Florian Mickler --=-3WouH82J6WMWfUvMN0bF Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 2010-12-31 at 15:08 +0100, Krzysztof Halasa wrote: > "Rafael J. Wysocki" writes: >=20 > >> This FREQ has been there for years. Not that it makes it smart, and > >> I'll obviously send Ben's patch upstream for 2.6.38. Still processing > >> incoming mail queue :-( > > > > Well, the patch is in the mainline, which is why it's still listed. >=20 > s/is/isn't/ I assume. >=20 > I was referring to the "regression" thing only, i.e. there is no any > regression here, AFAIK at least. There is a regression for the ov519 driver on ixp4xx. Ben. --=20 Ben Hutchings Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse. --=-3WouH82J6WMWfUvMN0bF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iQIVAwUATR3rbee/yOyVhhEJAQI4cQ//Wip3xNzlQpAPI+H1H8dAoMXNn7vXWrfw /nc4JmIHlxr0yZxpeqivCRO35Pxu/XMrxe4d758LWWYiSWsjHo4uh17lmI+O3/H9 lVbwsb/M+wHlBufBwQBG5OXFAfbTWV2IzYYc3QiZy2px0dkGAFoxw2VviK/ICAAk oIUB7dYZDm9KrIg9DCT+kWjvAiRVAi0tM0piIXnvvmwofqtQoTb0VYMu96hff/ue StBNay0ZEPCXlLZcdMcFMdatyvR8ji2Iauwr5DOT+uGl4kEvYDl2FHz7hjEaoNIp F7bFia2IGGp05uIUZ0Hv7w2omNg7txuvooXVtUa2G9dqWTcjXCU6rwAfiGxWPMzH jUZihed6rp1gfIi6ML3FkKgBFKUTd2isX/tTA7VEFYRH70+/TkjWFzQDYvjcxGQJ fx/8r6lbHHEIl8MrRrSRDKEZG+KMMgSLKYmkHBudnEY7YVb0f3uQO7Vc1c7AHoRy A7l5AeRtgl0dgwDO0hknSsvBMuMqqtrWupaYt/9EfGhltYWANsudyXMU7krYVJWo scuPpGrqTVaEBwEoZx9R/4KYtQrKuIjf4BvNlpqvTarXhguO9ujn3yxKZM4l6aAd FaV3Pk7451dm2YF13e/i1Eh+Urppn4nPohZgO8K5Uo0FvcTHBZK1JRsIEXE2XSzx qbukk+DDYs0= =OqBa -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-3WouH82J6WMWfUvMN0bF--