From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pablo de Lara Subject: [PATCH v6 04/10] test/hash: change order of loops in hash function tests Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 16:25:21 +0100 Message-ID: <1433949927-14767-5-git-send-email-pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com> References: <1432289771-12799-1-git-send-email-pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com> <1433949927-14767-1-git-send-email-pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com> To: dev@dpdk.org Return-path: Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 613AD9A9E for ; Wed, 10 Jun 2015 17:25:59 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <1433949927-14767-1-git-send-email-pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" In order to see more clearly the performance difference between different hash functions, order of the loops have been changed, so it iterates first through initial values, then key sizes and then the hash functions. Signed-off-by: Pablo de Lara --- app/test/test_hash_functions.c | 16 ++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/app/test/test_hash_functions.c b/app/test/test_hash_functions.c index aff5e6d..5156dfc 100644 --- a/app/test/test_hash_functions.c +++ b/app/test/test_hash_functions.c @@ -86,8 +86,8 @@ get_hash_name(rte_hash_function f) * Test a hash function. */ static void -run_hash_func_perf_test(rte_hash_function f, uint32_t init_val, - uint32_t key_len) +run_hash_func_perf_test(uint32_t key_len, uint32_t init_val, + rte_hash_function f) { static uint8_t key[HASHTEST_ITERATIONS][RTE_HASH_KEY_LENGTH_MAX]; uint64_t ticks, start, end; @@ -121,12 +121,12 @@ run_hash_func_perf_tests(void) HASHTEST_ITERATIONS); printf("Hash Func. , Key Length (bytes), Initial value, Ticks/Op.\n"); - for (i = 0; i < RTE_DIM(hashtest_funcs); i++) { - for (j = 0; j < RTE_DIM(hashtest_initvals); j++) { - for (k = 0; k < RTE_DIM(hashtest_key_lens); k++) { - run_hash_func_perf_test(hashtest_funcs[i], - hashtest_initvals[j], - hashtest_key_lens[k]); + for (i = 0; i < RTE_DIM(hashtest_initvals); i++) { + for (j = 0; j < RTE_DIM(hashtest_key_lens); j++) { + for (k = 0; k < RTE_DIM(hashtest_funcs); k++) { + run_hash_func_perf_test(hashtest_key_lens[j], + hashtest_initvals[i], + hashtest_funcs[k]); } } } -- 2.4.2