From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1755180AbbFRPME (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Thu, 18 Jun 2015 11:12:04 -0400
Received: from lb2-smtp-cloud6.xs4all.net ([194.109.24.28]:34293 "EHLO
	lb2-smtp-cloud6.xs4all.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK)
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752487AbbFRPLz (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 18 Jun 2015 11:11:55 -0400
Message-ID: <1434640312.2385.112.camel@x220>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: at91: add generated clock driver
From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
To: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
Cc: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>,
        Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@atmel.com>,
        Josh Wu <josh.wu@atmel.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        mturquette@baylibre.com
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2015 17:11:52 +0200
In-Reply-To: <20150618125918.GC27492@piout.net>
References: <1434547409-12232-1-git-send-email-nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
	 <1434611556.2385.8.camel@x220> <20150618093344.7d486e97@bbrezillon>
	 <55827606.7020908@atmel.com> <1434614090.2385.19.camel@x220>
	 <20150618125918.GC27492@piout.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.4 (3.10.4-4.fc20) 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Hi Alexandre,

You know, I can't read Nicolas' mind, so I couldn't say from the patch
itself that it was not a silly mistake.

I also can't look into the future. I can however check lkml (at least
the few weeks of lkml I keep at hand) and see whether there's another
patch pending that would allow this driver to build.

Discussing those two disabilities doesn't require a (much broader)
discussion on how Atmel goes about their Linux business. At least, I
hope it doesn't, because I don't actually have an opinion in that
matter.

Thanks,


Paul Bolle


From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: pebolle@tiscali.nl (Paul Bolle)
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2015 17:11:52 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] clk: at91: add generated clock driver
In-Reply-To: <20150618125918.GC27492@piout.net>
References: <1434547409-12232-1-git-send-email-nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
 <1434611556.2385.8.camel@x220> <20150618093344.7d486e97@bbrezillon>
 <55827606.7020908@atmel.com> <1434614090.2385.19.camel@x220>
 <20150618125918.GC27492@piout.net>
Message-ID: <1434640312.2385.112.camel@x220>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

Hi Alexandre,

You know, I can't read Nicolas' mind, so I couldn't say from the patch
itself that it was not a silly mistake.

I also can't look into the future. I can however check lkml (at least
the few weeks of lkml I keep at hand) and see whether there's another
patch pending that would allow this driver to build.

Discussing those two disabilities doesn't require a (much broader)
discussion on how Atmel goes about their Linux business. At least, I
hope it doesn't, because I don't actually have an opinion in that
matter.

Thanks,


Paul Bolle