From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: benoar@dolka.fr (Benjamin Cama) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 19:49:39 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Re: Linkstation Mini and __machine_arch_type problem, not booting since 3.8 In-Reply-To: <20150622120829.GL2936@io.lakedaemon.net> References: <558278A8.2050406@arm.com> <1434677895.4767.11.camel@dolka.fr> <5583DD23.90505@arm.com> <1434716194.17448.28.camel@x60s> <20150619131315.GR7557@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20150619152552.GF2936@io.lakedaemon.net> <20150619154850.GT7557@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20150619171346.GG2936@io.lakedaemon.net> <1434908275.5657.17.camel@dolka.fr> <20150622120829.GL2936@io.lakedaemon.net> Message-ID: <1434995379.5657.49.camel@dolka.fr> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Le lundi 22 juin 2015 ? 12:08 +0000, Jason Cooper a ?crit : > On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 07:37:55PM +0200, Benjamin Cama wrote: > > Le vendredi 19 juin 2015 ?? 17:13 +0000, Jason Cooper a ??crit : > > > On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 04:48:50PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 03:25:52PM +0000, Jason Cooper wrote: > > > > > Let's just get the dts patch reviewed and merged first. Russell > > > > > actually wrote the patch to do what he's describing for mach-dove. > > > > > > > > > > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2014-December/309684.html > > > > > > > > > > Although, it looks like it never got updated for submission... > > > > > > > > > > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2014-December/311800.html > > > > > > > > I do still have that patch, it's based on v4.0 though - like all my > > > > Dove work, it only builds on the previous -final kernel release. > > > > > > Benjamin, after the dts, would you mind picking up Russell's dove patch and > > > making a cooresponding orion5x patch? > > > > If the plan is to move to DT, is it still needed? > > Sure, because orion5x is slow-going. There aren't that many users. > Since we prefer tested patches, we need to grab the opportunity when it > comes a long. It could be another year or more before we see more > patches for orion5x. Fully converting orion5x to DT doesn't have a > schedule, it's as we encounter devs willing to post patches for their > boards. According to rmk, letting their board break may be a quicker way to get the patches ;-) (and I agree with that: I wouldn't have moved to DT so fast if the build didn't break, it is a good incentive). > The opportunity here is that you were just booting a legacy board file > on an orion5x SoC. Therefore, you're in the best position to write/test > the irq change. OK, I understand. I'll try to find the time to test the non-DT case and offer a patch. About Russell's one: how is the Signed-off-by going in this case? I put his and then mine? Regards, -- benjamin