From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Dumazet Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] net: Set sk_txhash from a random number Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2015 12:06:48 +0200 Message-ID: <1438164408.20182.86.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com> References: <1438124526-2129341-1-git-send-email-tom@herbertland.com> <1438124526-2129341-2-git-send-email-tom@herbertland.com> <20150729091333.GB13113@pox.localdomain> <1438162146.20182.74.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com> <20150729095416.GC13113@pox.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Tom Herbert , davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com To: Thomas Graf Return-path: Received: from mail-wi0-f173.google.com ([209.85.212.173]:34641 "EHLO mail-wi0-f173.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750800AbbG2KGw (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Jul 2015 06:06:52 -0400 Received: by wibud3 with SMTP id ud3so213763925wib.1 for ; Wed, 29 Jul 2015 03:06:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20150729095416.GC13113@pox.localdomain> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, 2015-07-29 at 11:54 +0200, Thomas Graf wrote: > skb_set_hash_from_sk() > skb_get_hash() > > Am I misreading this? I'm not using SO_REUSEPORT and it might be OK > to assume that different sockets may go to different queues even if > the L4 tuple is identical. skb_set_hash_from_sk() sets skb->hash in output path. Nothing uses it then later. bonding uses its own hash functions. SO_REUSEPORT is on input path, and uses its own hash anyway.