All the mail mirrored from lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
To: Doug Smythies <dsmythies@telus.net>
Cc: 'Riku Voipio' <riku.voipio@linaro.org>,
	'Michal Marek' <mmarek@suse.com>,
	'maximilian attems' <maks@stro.at>,
	'linux-kbuild' <linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org>,
	'Chris J Arges' <chris.j.arges@canonical.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] deb-pkg: add source package
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2015 15:17:32 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1442240252.2298.35.camel@decadent.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <000f01d0eef6$76b715a0$642540e0$@net>

On Mon, 2015-09-14 at 07:05 -0700, Doug Smythies wrote:
> On 2015.09.13 23:33 Riku Voipio wrote:
> > On 14 September 2015 at 06:08, Doug Smythies <dsmythies@telus.net> wrote:
> >> However, I do not understand why I now get a .change
> >> file that I do not want.
> 
> > Is there some problem the presence of this file causes, or is just
> > aesthetic issue?
> 
> I don't want to waste the extra kernel compile time
> for this step, particularly when doing a bisection.

It *shouldn't* take long, but apparently it is because we're wrongly
including multiple builds in the .changes file.

[...]
> Checksums-Sha1:
>  08bf501667de853765641be9d5ab33e61621cc46 967508 linux-firmware-image-4.0.0-v40-force_4.0.0-v40-force-1_amd64.deb
>  8c4621d4fb354bda17acd66e8becedd996745b9a 6855204 linux-headers-4.0.0-v40-force_4.0.0-v40-force-1_amd64.deb
>  2a36875a9576e11e2e295bf75bb1049e27de2b7c 789714 linux-libc-dev_4.0.0-v40-force-1_amd64.deb
>  18fbde8808ba66483036ffa8c5a4f8db1dd67ff6 44133760 linux-image-4.0.0-v40-force_4.0.0-v40-force-1_amd64.deb
>  1ef5d864ade96745db41554e3f8ebe8c1a99564d 967628 linux-firmware-image-4.1.0-rc4_4.1.0-rc4-2_amd64.deb
>  8d2f578e9ee867cd8a3c10183558f5398cfd551b 6938980 linux-headers-4.1.0-rc4_4.1.0-rc4-2_amd64.deb
>  5e9fccf95ab662fd1fa0dbf27fb64c0d4c9b3607 798728 linux-libc-dev_4.1.0-rc4-2_amd64.deb
>  661772f12127051deb6412096d7bba53fc9eb8ae 44237546 linux-image-4.1.0-rc4_4.1.0-rc4-2_amd64.deb
>  2a0739993973a6adbae88b4404f2368f9489d615 966500 linux-firmware-image-4.0.0_4.0.0-3_amd64.deb
>  3d3ec6e014c1b064941205887079561afe7cbc2e 6856826 linux-headers-4.0.0_4.0.0-3_amd64.deb
>  e98604173c0caad56597d2fe2f156e61d4fc44de 789840 linux-libc-dev_4.0.0-3_amd64.deb
>  67a5ec77c10eb9dc98c9c42362eccad4370a7433 44040296 linux-image-4.0.0_4.0.0-3_amd64.deb
>  9d07dc5a1fd0ced5975d1359ba91de4f54e7c18f 968554 linux-firmware-image-4.1.0-rc5-force_4.1.0-rc5-force-4_amd64.deb
>  0e645a15ddde5c97532e61d18c42258c489275ef 6942192 linux-headers-4.1.0-rc5-force_4.1.0-rc5-force-4_amd64.deb
>  334986f94a0d47330f40461826f43ea60f38b6c7 798876 linux-libc-dev_4.1.0-rc5-force-4_amd64.deb
>  a41a3d6319e1ddf60943f481e43ef06aa08df649 44424044 linux-image-4.1.0-rc5-force_4.1.0-rc5-force-4_amd64.deb
>  4df0e4dc13bc6529bb6ea8fabfde91d6e882a4ed 966794 linux-firmware-image-4.1.0-rc5-debug_4.1.0-rc5-debug-5_amd64.deb
> 
> ... very many similar lines, for other kernels, deleted ...
[...]

It looks like we need to delete debian/files at the beginning of the
package build process.  For a normal Debian package build this wouldn't
be needed because we could expect the 'clean' rule to be run between
building different package versions, and that would do it.

Ben.


  reply	other threads:[~2015-09-14 14:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-09-14  3:08 [PATCH v5] deb-pkg: add source package Doug Smythies
2015-09-14  6:33 ` Riku Voipio
2015-09-14 14:05   ` Doug Smythies
2015-09-14 14:17     ` Ben Hutchings [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-09-02  9:57 riku.voipio
2015-09-02 13:50 ` Ben Hutchings
2015-09-02 16:27   ` maximilian attems
2015-09-04 10:38     ` Michal Marek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1442240252.2298.35.camel@decadent.org.uk \
    --to=ben@decadent.org.uk \
    --cc=chris.j.arges@canonical.com \
    --cc=dsmythies@telus.net \
    --cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maks@stro.at \
    --cc=mmarek@suse.com \
    --cc=riku.voipio@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.