From: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
mingo@redhat.com, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
vincent.guittot@linaro.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
rostedt@goodmis.org, bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de,
bristot@redhat.com, vschneid@redhat.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, wuyun.abel@bytedance.com,
tglx@linutronix.de, Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>,
Oliver Sang <oliver.sang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 08/10] sched/fair: Implement delayed dequeue
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2024 18:03:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <18f557cd69fc65f5b43daddd8ad3e43278dfa44e.camel@gmx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240426111607.GL12673@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On Fri, 2024-04-26 at 13:16 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >
> > I ended up with the below instead; lemme go run this unixbench
> > spawn on it.
>
> Seems to survive that.
>
> I pushed out the patches with updates to queue/sched/eevdf
Yup, solid... but fwiw, tbench liked the previous version better.
trusty (with a 'c') ole i7-4790 box, tbench 8
for i in 1 2 3; do tbench.sh 8 10 2>&1|grep Throughput; done
6.9.0.gc942a0c-master +eevdf.current
NO_DELAY_DEQUEUE
Throughput 3285.04 MB/sec 8 clients 8 procs max_latency=3.481 ms
Throughput 3289.66 MB/sec 8 clients 8 procs max_latency=8.124 ms
Throughput 3293.83 MB/sec 8 clients 8 procs max_latency=2.210 ms
DELAY_DEQUEUE
Throughput 3246.3 MB/sec 8 clients 8 procs max_latency=2.181 ms
Throughput 3236.96 MB/sec 8 clients 8 procs max_latency=6.988 ms
Throughput 3248.6 MB/sec 8 clients 8 procs max_latency=2.130 ms
6.9.0.gc942a0c-master +eevdf.prev
NO_DELAY_DEQUEUE
Throughput 3457.92 MB/sec 8 clients 8 procs max_latency=3.885 ms
Throughput 3470.95 MB/sec 8 clients 8 procs max_latency=4.475 ms
Throughput 3467.87 MB/sec 8 clients 8 procs max_latency=2.182 ms
DELAY_DEQUEUE
Throughput 3712.96 MB/sec 8 clients 8 procs max_latency=4.231 ms
Throughput 3667.87 MB/sec 8 clients 8 procs max_latency=5.020 ms
Throughput 3679.65 MB/sec 8 clients 8 procs max_latency=2.847 ms
Trees are identical modulo extracted eevdf additions. The previous win
that put eevdf on par with cfs went missing.. and then some.
For reference, cfs vs eevdf log extract for previously mentioned gain.
6.1.87-cfs
Throughput 3660.98 MB/sec 8 clients 8 procs max_latency=2.204 ms
Throughput 3678.67 MB/sec 8 clients 8 procs max_latency=10.127 ms
Throughput 3631.89 MB/sec 8 clients 8 procs max_latency=13.019 ms
1.000
6.1.87-eevdf - naked eevdf +fixes
Throughput 3441.86 MB/sec 8 clients 8 procs max_latency=3.943 ms
Throughput 3439.68 MB/sec 8 clients 8 procs max_latency=4.285 ms
Throughput 3432.28 MB/sec 8 clients 8 procs max_latency=3.557 ms
vs cfs .940
6.1.87-eevdf +delay_dequeue.prev patch set
DELAY_DEQUEUE
Throughput 3696.94 MB/sec 8 clients 8 procs max_latency=2.179 ms
Throughput 3694.64 MB/sec 8 clients 8 procs max_latency=6.322 ms
Throughput 3654.49 MB/sec 8 clients 8 procs max_latency=4.101 ms
vs cfs 1.006
box waxes nostalgic (son, when I was yo age [flex])
4.19.312
Throughput 4099.07 MB/sec 8 clients 8 procs max_latency=2.169 ms
Throughput 4107.49 MB/sec 8 clients 8 procs max_latency=12.404 ms
Throughput 4118.41 MB/sec 8 clients 8 procs max_latency=14.150 ms
-Mike
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-26 16:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-05 10:27 [RFC][PATCH 00/10] sched/fair: Complete EEVDF Peter Zijlstra
2024-04-05 10:27 ` [RFC][PATCH 01/10] sched/eevdf: Add feature comments Peter Zijlstra
2024-04-05 10:27 ` [RFC][PATCH 02/10] sched/eevdf: Remove min_vruntime_copy Peter Zijlstra
2024-04-05 10:27 ` [RFC][PATCH 03/10] sched/fair: Cleanup pick_task_fair() vs throttle Peter Zijlstra
2024-04-05 21:11 ` Benjamin Segall
2024-04-05 10:27 ` [RFC][PATCH 04/10] sched/fair: Cleanup pick_task_fair()s curr Peter Zijlstra
2024-04-05 10:27 ` [RFC][PATCH 05/10] sched/fair: Unify pick_{,next_}_task_fair() Peter Zijlstra
2024-04-06 2:20 ` Mike Galbraith
2024-04-05 10:28 ` [RFC][PATCH 06/10] sched: Allow sched_class::dequeue_task() to fail Peter Zijlstra
2024-04-05 10:28 ` [RFC][PATCH 07/10] sched/fair: Re-organize dequeue_task_fair() Peter Zijlstra
2024-04-05 10:28 ` [RFC][PATCH 08/10] sched/fair: Implement delayed dequeue Peter Zijlstra
2024-04-06 9:23 ` Chen Yu
2024-04-08 9:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-04-11 1:32 ` Yan-Jie Wang
2024-04-25 10:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-04-12 10:42 ` K Prateek Nayak
2024-04-15 10:56 ` Mike Galbraith
2024-04-16 3:18 ` K Prateek Nayak
2024-04-16 5:36 ` Mike Galbraith
2024-04-18 16:24 ` Mike Galbraith
2024-04-18 17:08 ` K Prateek Nayak
2024-04-24 15:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-04-25 11:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-04-26 10:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-04-26 11:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-04-26 16:03 ` Mike Galbraith [this message]
2024-04-27 6:42 ` Mike Galbraith
2024-04-28 16:32 ` Mike Galbraith
2024-04-29 12:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-04-15 17:07 ` Luis Machado
2024-04-24 15:15 ` Luis Machado
2024-04-25 10:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-04-25 11:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-04-26 9:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-04-26 9:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-04-26 10:16 ` Luis Machado
2024-04-29 14:33 ` Luis Machado
2024-05-02 10:26 ` Luis Machado
2024-05-10 14:49 ` Luis Machado
2024-05-15 9:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-05-15 11:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-05-15 18:03 ` Mike Galbraith
2024-04-26 10:15 ` Luis Machado
2024-04-20 5:57 ` Mike Galbraith
2024-04-22 13:13 ` Tobias Huschle
2024-04-05 10:28 ` [RFC][PATCH 09/10] sched/eevdf: Allow shorter slices to wakeup-preempt Peter Zijlstra
2024-04-05 10:28 ` [RFC][PATCH 10/10] sched/eevdf: Use sched_attr::sched_runtime to set request/slice suggestion Peter Zijlstra
2024-04-06 8:16 ` Hillf Danton
2024-05-07 5:34 ` Mike Galbraith
2024-05-15 10:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-05-07 15:15 ` Chen Yu
2024-05-08 13:52 ` Mike Galbraith
2024-05-09 3:48 ` Chen Yu
2024-05-09 5:00 ` Mike Galbraith
2024-05-13 4:07 ` K Prateek Nayak
2024-05-14 9:18 ` Chen Yu
2024-05-14 15:23 ` K Prateek Nayak
2024-05-14 16:15 ` Chen Yu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=18f557cd69fc65f5b43daddd8ad3e43278dfa44e.camel@gmx.de \
--to=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=bristot@redhat.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=oliver.sang@intel.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=wuyun.abel@bytedance.com \
--cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.