From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBFB6706D9 for ; Tue, 16 Jun 2015 08:40:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fmsmga003.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.29]) by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 16 Jun 2015 01:40:16 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.13,625,1427785200"; d="scan'208";a="509018727" Received: from unknown (HELO peggleto-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com) ([10.252.25.227]) by FMSMGA003.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 16 Jun 2015 01:40:16 -0700 From: Paul Eggleton To: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2015 09:40:15 +0100 Message-ID: <1946263.B0TEDLLAIC@peggleto-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com> Organization: Intel Corporation User-Agent: KMail/4.14.7 (Linux/4.0.4-202.fc21.x86_64; KDE/4.14.9; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <1FDE9321-AA20-49D9-A4BE-A4B4514439DB@gmail.com> References: <1429121824-31200-2-git-send-email-Liam.Howlett@WindRiver.com> <41DEA4B02DBDEF40A0F3B6D0DDB123798D203356@ORSMSX101.amr.corp.intel.com> <1FDE9321-AA20-49D9-A4BE-A4B4514439DB@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: "Howlett, Liam \(Wind River\)" , "bitbake-devel@lists.openembedded.org" , Gary Thomas Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] fetch2: Add BB_ALLOWED_NETWORKS support X-BeenThere: bitbake-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussion that advance bitbake development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2015 08:40:16 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" On Monday 15 June 2015 23:47:29 Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: > On June 15, 2015 4:03:11 PM GMT+02:00, "Rifenbark, Scott M" wrote: > >Hi, > > > >Here is a first draft of documenting the BB_ALLOWED_NETWORKS variable > >in the BitBake User Manual. I re-wrote the original text to be active > >voice and applied some different organization of the facts to help the > >flow out. Regarding Gary's input about BB_NO_NETWORK..... I took a > >half guess at incorporating it. Please look this new description over > >and let me know of any corrections I need to make. > >http://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/1.9/bitbake-user-manual/bitbake-user-manua > >l.html#var-BB_ALLOWED_NETWORKS. > Was the v3 fixed / extended to allow for netmasks, btw? > Think > /etc/hosts > foo.example.com 10.0.0.1 > bar.example.com 10.0.0.254 > baz.example.com ::1 > > BB_ALLOWED_NETWORKS = 10.0.0.0/24 1.1.1.1/31 ::1/127 I don't believe so. You can see what actually went in here: http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/poky/commit/?id=59ce7d02a57e0a642d839ab48677f6ac1886180f Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre