From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2015 12:41:13 +0200 Message-ID: <1972650.TnPARfU7Gx@soho> In-Reply-To: <1281528104.2749631.1434707703235.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> References: <7ad4e107e9fd70e40e7a622724d8e211.squirrel@sourcetrek.com> <1281528104.2749631.1434707703235.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Subject: Re: [Xenomai] Rtnet driver of RTL8111/8168/8411 List-Id: Discussions about the Xenomai project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Gabriele Moabiti Cc: "xenomai@xenomai.org" El Divendres, 19 de juny de 2015, a les 09:55:03, Gabriele Moabiti va=20= escriure: > In RTNET mailing list an update driver was sent: >=20 > http://sourceforge.net/p/rtnet/mailman/message/31389885/ >=20 > I've changed this driver and used successfully with some 8168/8111 ne= twork > card.Hope this helps. Gabriele Thanks Gabriele, It doesn't compile, so I don't know how updated is that driver. >=20 >=20 >=20 > Il Gioved=C3=AC 18 Giugno 2015 17:27, Gilles Chanteperdrix > ha scritto: > Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote: > > Hi, > >=20 > > just to confirm. I assume that if my box has this ethernet chipset:= > >=20 > > Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL8111/8168/8411 PCI Express Gigab= it > > Ethernet > >=20 > > the rt_r8169 doesn't work, although the linux module is r8169. > >=20 > > Is it correct? > >=20 > > And I'm saying this because although I'm using xenomai 2.6.4 (lates= t > > stable) > > and rtnet (git updated) when I load the module no rtethX interface = is > > generated. >=20 > I think rt_8169 supports 8169 only. I added support for the chipset o= n my > Atom-based board to xenomai 3 rtnet. Do not remember which it was 811= 11 or > 8168. I think that 8168 .... do you think that you will make a 8111 driver? Leopold --=20 -- Linux User 152692 GPG: 05F4A7A949A2D9AA Catalonia ------------------------------------- A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?