From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Erik Mouw Subject: Re: Hi Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 16:40:20 +0100 Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20030219154020.GC2516@arthur.ubicom.tudelft.nl> References: <20030218150457.20101.qmail@webmail30.rediffmail.com> <20030218163422.GC1399@arthur.ubicom.tudelft.nl> <1045609648.18245.0.camel@imladris.demon.co.uk> <86adgsuxrl.fsf@trasno.mitica> <1045668167.19863.27.camel@passion.cambridge.redhat.com> <8665rguvrq.fsf@trasno.mitica> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="YD3LsXFS42OYHhNZ" Cc: David Woodhouse , Rajaram Suresh Gaunker , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, kernelnewbies@nl.linux.org Return-path: To: Juan Quintela Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8665rguvrq.fsf@trasno.mitica> List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org --YD3LsXFS42OYHhNZ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 04:37:13PM +0100, Juan Quintela wrote: > I think that the only reason why encryption at the filesystem level > makes sense is when you want to only encrypt _some_ files, but at that > point, you can also encrypt by hand them with some script/similar :( Or do something like libz: on the fly or even transparent encryption/decryption of files. Erik --=20 J.A.K. (Erik) Mouw Email: J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl mouw@nl.linux.org --YD3LsXFS42OYHhNZ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+U6Vk/PlVHJtIto0RAr0VAKCBeEJshArIv4Lqk/enHpwbza0zowCfcfD8 +lJJnYism/1tyZS6Uxoev1g= =6IyJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --YD3LsXFS42OYHhNZ--