All the mail mirrored from lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ragnar Kjørstad" <reiserfs@ragnark.vestdata.no>
To: Lars Marowsky-Bree <lmb@suse.de>
Cc: kend@xanoptix.com, reiserfs-list@namesys.com
Subject: Re: Snapshots a la NetApp?
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2003 13:49:35 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030324124934.GD1318@vestdata.no> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030323111831.GF12916@marowsky-bree.de>

On Sun, Mar 23, 2003 at 12:18:31PM +0100, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
> > I'm just wondering if there's any development being done on NetApp-like
> > snapshots.  (This differs from LVM snapshots in that it's file-by-file,
> > instead of volume based.)  If not, has anyone given it any consideration? 
> > It would be a huge win for the RAID-in-a-box folks, and, speaking as a
> > sysadmin, is something about which I dream frequently.
> 
> Well, implementing it at the LVM level isn't entirely bad though. What kind of
> advantage would have implementing at the filesystem level have? It would need
> to compensate at least the disadvantage of being less general.

I think the main advantage of having it in the filesystem is that it
makes the snapshots available to the users. This makes it possible for
regular users to undelete / restore files without having to contact the
sysadmin. 

As for linux implementations of NetApp-like snapshots you should check
out snapfs: 

http://www.mountainviewdata.com/us/product/product_snap_1.html
http://www-mddsp.enel.ucalgary.ca/People/adilger/snapfs/
http://sourcefrog.net/projects/snapfs/


-- 
Ragnar Kjørstad
Zet.no

  reply	other threads:[~2003-03-24 12:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-03-22 23:22 Encryption Pierre Abbat
2003-03-22 23:29 ` Encryption Yury Umanets
2003-03-24 20:37   ` Encryption Hans Reiser
2003-03-25 19:18     ` Encryption Edward Shushkin
2003-03-23  3:38 ` Snapshots a la NetApp? kend
2003-03-23  9:16   ` Heinz-Josef Claes
2003-03-24 20:49     ` Hans Reiser
2003-03-24 21:42       ` Heinz-Josef Claes
2003-03-25  0:03         ` Tom Vier
2003-03-26 21:11           ` Heinz-Josef Claes
2003-03-25  2:35         ` Hans Reiser
2003-03-26 14:15           ` Heinz-Josef Claes
2003-03-26 18:37             ` Hans Reiser
2003-03-26 22:45               ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2003-03-25  6:15       ` unsubscribe Voicu Liviu
2003-03-23 11:18   ` Snapshots a la NetApp? Lars Marowsky-Bree
2003-03-24 12:49     ` Ragnar Kjørstad [this message]
2003-03-23 12:44   ` Oleg Drokin
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-03-26 17:54 Barry, Christopher
2003-03-26 18:29 ` Heinz-Josef Claes

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030324124934.GD1318@vestdata.no \
    --to=reiserfs@ragnark.vestdata.no \
    --cc=kend@xanoptix.com \
    --cc=lmb@suse.de \
    --cc=reiserfs-list@namesys.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.