From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "=?iso-8859-1?q?R=E9mi?= Denis-Courmont" <remi@remlab.net>
Subject: Re:
Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2012 17:35:06 +0300
Message-ID: <201209081735.06809@leon.remlab.net>
References: <CAG9fbzbQg9vWgt6ZcaRYKUQJNzQEziFp6_3Q_cJtSthsjhbN2Q@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
To: ranjith kumar <ranjithproxy@gmail.com>
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from oyp.chewa.net ([91.121.6.101]:39036 "EHLO oyp.chewa.net"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1751776Ab2IHOfJ convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT
	<rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Sat, 8 Sep 2012 10:35:09 -0400
In-Reply-To: <CAG9fbzbQg9vWgt6ZcaRYKUQJNzQEziFp6_3Q_cJtSthsjhbN2Q@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>

Le samedi 8 septembre 2012 17:13:02, ranjith kumar a =E9crit :
> We know that, in TCP socket programming accept() is a "blocking call"=
=2E
> Is  there any alternative to make "unblocked" accept() call?

Yes and there is ample and easy to find documentation on the Internets.


--=20
R=E9mi Denis-Courmont
http://www.remlab.net/