From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932714AbbFHPWN (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Jun 2015 11:22:13 -0400 Received: from smtprelay0086.hostedemail.com ([216.40.44.86]:39796 "EHLO smtprelay.hostedemail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932334AbbFHPVy (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Jun 2015 11:21:54 -0400 X-Session-Marker: 726F737465647440676F6F646D69732E6F7267 X-Spam-Summary: 2,0,0,,d41d8cd98f00b204,rostedt@goodmis.org,:::::::::::,RULES_HIT:41:273:355:379:541:599:800:960:973:988:989:1260:1277:1311:1313:1314:1345:1359:1437:1515:1516:1518:1534:1538:1593:1594:1711:1714:1730:1747:1777:1792:2393:2553:2559:2562:2693:3138:3139:3140:3141:3142:3350:3865:3867:3868:3871:3872:3873:3874:5007:6248:6261:7875:7903:10004:10400:10848:10967:11232:11658:11914:12517:12519:12740:13069:13311:13357:21080,0,RBL:none,CacheIP:none,Bayesian:0.5,0.5,0.5,Netcheck:none,DomainCache:0,MSF:not bulk,SPF:fn,MSBL:0,DNSBL:none,Custom_rules:0:0:0 X-HE-Tag: sail39_84c343b286325 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 1682 Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2015 11:21:49 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt To: Gil Fruchter Cc: "mingo@redhat.com" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Gilad Ben Yossef , "Chris Metcalf" , Noam Camus Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] tracing: Prefer kcalloc over kzalloc with multiply Message-ID: <20150608112149.3c8b5f81@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: References: <1433251589-21013-1-git-send-email-gilf@ezchip.com> <1433251589-21013-2-git-send-email-gilf@ezchip.com> <20150602101516.7dd2feb6@gandalf.local.home> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.11.1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Sorry for the late reply, just got back from travels. On Wed, 3 Jun 2015 11:53:59 +0000 Gil Fruchter wrote: > > Thanks for the input Steve. > I will create a v2 with an appropriate explanation for this change. > > Can I add a Reviewed-by tag by you? > Is this going to go through another tree other than tracing? That is, if it is going to go through my tree, it will require my Signed-off-by, and that implies Reviewed-by. -- Steve