All the mail mirrored from lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@maine.edu>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: perf: aux area related crash and warnings
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 22:24:36 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150615202435.GB12450@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87egld2l2o.fsf@ashishki-desk.ger.corp.intel.com>


* Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> wrote:

> Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> writes:
> 
> > Alex, any clue?
> 
> Let me look into it. Definitely haven't seen anything like that in my
> tests.

That's natural: Vince is running randomize fuzzing tests, so you should look out 
for boundary conditions and 'nonsensical' values that won't normally trigger in 
functional testing.

In fact Vince is using 'directed fuzzing': i.e. the fuzzer is aware of the general 
perf ABI structure and will try to generate partially valid, partially randomized 
requests, to be able to test 'leaf' functionality of the perf ABI as well, which 
would otherwise need astronomical odds to occur in a pure fuzzing test.

These crashes started popping up when Vince added 'AUX area awareness' to the 
fuzzer.

> >> [36299.068111]  [<ffffffff810c2acf>] do_raw_spin_lock+0x13f/0x180
> >> [36299.074897]  [<ffffffff816de6e9>] _raw_spin_lock+0x39/0x40
> >> [36299.081276]  [<ffffffff8117a039>] ? free_pcppages_bulk+0x39/0x620
> >> [36299.088340]  [<ffffffff8117a039>] free_pcppages_bulk+0x39/0x620
> >> [36299.095182]  [<ffffffff81177e14>] ? free_pages_prepare+0x3a4/0x550
> >> [36299.102291]  [<ffffffff811c9936>] ? kfree_debugcheck+0x16/0x40
> >> [36299.108987]  [<ffffffff8117a938>] free_hot_cold_page+0x178/0x1a0
> >> [36299.115850]  [<ffffffff8117aa47>] __free_pages+0x37/0x50
> >> [36299.121991]  [<ffffffff8116ae0a>] rb_free_aux+0xba/0xf0
> 
> This one goes to free aux pages from nmi context, looks like aux buffer was 
> unmapped while the event was running, so here it dropped the last reference.

Yeah, that in itself is an absolute no-no - so I guess refcounting went wrong 
somewhere? (assuming it exists properly).

Thanks,

	Ingo

  reply	other threads:[~2015-06-15 20:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-06-12  3:15 perf: aux area related crash and warnings Vince Weaver
2015-06-12 18:42 ` Vince Weaver
2015-06-15 12:20   ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-15 12:49     ` Alexander Shishkin
2015-06-15 20:24       ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2015-06-16 11:37       ` Alexander Shishkin
2015-06-18  9:09         ` Ingo Molnar
2015-06-18  9:35           ` Alexander Shishkin
2015-06-18 10:24             ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-18 16:30           ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-06-18 10:32         ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-18 13:11           ` Alexander Shishkin
2015-06-19 14:21           ` Vince Weaver
2015-07-06 15:34           ` [tip:perf/urgent] perf: Fix AUX buffer refcounting tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150615202435.GB12450@gmail.com \
    --to=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=eranian@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=vincent.weaver@maine.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.