From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56172)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ehabkost@redhat.com>) id 1Z5fOQ-0006cW-5J
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 18 Jun 2015 15:22:34 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ehabkost@redhat.com>) id 1Z5fOL-0001uR-5R
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 18 Jun 2015 15:22:30 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:49029)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ehabkost@redhat.com>) id 1Z5fOK-0001uK-Vx
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 18 Jun 2015 15:22:25 -0400
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2015 16:22:20 -0300
From: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20150618192220.GG3874@thinpad.lan.raisama.net>
References: <1434648295-30584-1-git-send-email-crosthwaite.peter@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1434648295-30584-1-git-send-email-crosthwaite.peter@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 0/8] More core code ENV_GET_CPU removals
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Peter Crosthwaite <crosthwaitepeter@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Crosthwaite <crosthwaite.peter@gmail.com>, rth@twiddle.net, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, aurelien@aurel32.net, afaerber@suse.de

On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 10:24:47AM -0700, Peter Crosthwaite wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> I'm moving towards the goal of having no core code usages of ENV_GET_CPU.
> This has two advantages:
> 
> 1: It means we are closer to common-obj'ing core code like exec.c, cpus.c
> and friends.
> 2: Multi arch is easier if ENV_GET_CPU() stays arch specific. It means I
> don't need those patches where I reorder the env within the arch specific
> CPUState. This allows continuing placement of arch specifics before the
> env in the CPU container (which has TCG perf advantages).
> 
> Due to point 1, I'm sending this ahead as I think it has standalone value,
> rather than send as part of multi-arch.

Series doesn't apply cleanly on top of latest qemu.git (commit
8ffe756d), due to a small conflict on patch 1/8 (on target-arm/cpu.c).
What's the commit ID you used as base for the series?

Probably there's no need to resend, though, as "git am -3" seems to
handle the conflict properly.

-- 
Eduardo