From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Catalin Marinas Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm64: qcom: Add define for ARMv8 implementer (MIDR) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 12:09:33 +0100 Message-ID: <20150622110932.GB16018@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com> References: <1434146263-30972-1-git-send-email-timur@codeaurora.org> <20150615105933.GE17322@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <558497A5.4020700@codeaurora.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:48530 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751120AbbFVLJh (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Jun 2015 07:09:37 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <558497A5.4020700@codeaurora.org> Sender: linux-arm-msm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org To: Timur Tabi Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, Vipul Gandhi , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Shanker Donthineni , kvm@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 05:28:53PM -0500, Timur Tabi wrote: > On 06/15/2015 05:59 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote: > >I think this patch together with the second one could go through the kvm > >tree. For the core arm64 part: > > > >Acked-by: Catalin Marinas > > Suzuki Poulose posted a patch that adds generic support for ARMv8 KVM > targets. I want to drop my second patch, so can we pick up this first patch > through the ARM tree? So if the second patch is no longer needed, what's using this patch? I would defer merging it until actually required in some part of the kernel. -- Catalin From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: catalin.marinas@arm.com (Catalin Marinas) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 12:09:33 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 1/2] arm64: qcom: Add define for ARMv8 implementer (MIDR) In-Reply-To: <558497A5.4020700@codeaurora.org> References: <1434146263-30972-1-git-send-email-timur@codeaurora.org> <20150615105933.GE17322@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <558497A5.4020700@codeaurora.org> Message-ID: <20150622110932.GB16018@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 05:28:53PM -0500, Timur Tabi wrote: > On 06/15/2015 05:59 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote: > >I think this patch together with the second one could go through the kvm > >tree. For the core arm64 part: > > > >Acked-by: Catalin Marinas > > Suzuki Poulose posted a patch that adds generic support for ARMv8 KVM > targets. I want to drop my second patch, so can we pick up this first patch > through the ARM tree? So if the second patch is no longer needed, what's using this patch? I would defer merging it until actually required in some part of the kernel. -- Catalin