From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: Xen PV IOMMU interface draft C
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2015 10:40:58 -0400
Message-ID: <20150629144058.GB24629@l.oracle.com>
References: <557B0C35.4080907@citrix.com> <558D280B.3050806@citrix.com>
	<1435316624.32500.165.camel@citrix.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39])
	by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>) id 1Z9aFE-0005Np-Ep
	for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Mon, 29 Jun 2015 14:41:12 +0000
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1435316624.32500.165.camel@citrix.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
Cc: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>, "Zhang, Yu C" <yu.c.zhang@intel.com>, Stefano Stabellini <Stefano.Stabellini@eu.citrix.com>, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>, Julien Grall <julien.grall@citrix.com>, Paul Durrant <Paul.Durrant@citrix.com>, "Lv,
	Zhiyuan" <zhiyuan.lv@intel.com>, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>, xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>, Malcolm Crossley <malcolm.crossley@citrix.com>, David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 12:03:44PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> +ARM devs.
> 
> On Fri, 2015-06-26 at 11:23 +0100, Malcolm Crossley wrote:
> > Hi All,
> 
> I had a chat with Malcolm about this with respect to ARM.
> 
> The upshot is that this does not help us to remove the dom0 1:1
> workaround or associated swiotlb uses on systems without an SMMU, nor
> does it allow us to sensibly do passthrough on systems which lack an
> SMMU.

What would?