From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com (Boris Brezillon) Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2015 09:30:13 +0200 Subject: [RFC PATCH 00/15] pwm: add support for atomic update In-Reply-To: <20150702070343.GD11824@pengutronix.de> References: <1435738921-25027-1-git-send-email-boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> <20150702070343.GD11824@pengutronix.de> Message-ID: <20150702093013.66229df5@bbrezillon> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Uwe, On Thu, 2 Jul 2015 09:03:43 +0200 Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote: > Hello Boris, > > On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 10:21:46AM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote: > > This series adds support for atomic PWM update, or ITO, the capability > > to update all the parameters of a PWM device (enabled/disabled, period, > > duty and polarity) in one go. > on first reading the subject of your series I thought it was about > asserting that the newly set config is active before the call to > pwm_config (et al) returns. That's a problem I addressed a few times in > the past. I wonder if it's only me or if a different wording should be > used for "update all parameters with a single function call". Yep, I can reword it differently. > > But other than that I like the series. Great! Best Regards, Boris -- Boris Brezillon, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Boris Brezillon Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/15] pwm: add support for atomic update Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2015 09:30:13 +0200 Message-ID: <20150702093013.66229df5@bbrezillon> References: <1435738921-25027-1-git-send-email-boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> <20150702070343.GD11824@pengutronix.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20150702070343.GD11824@pengutronix.de> Sender: linux-pwm-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Uwe =?UTF-8?B?S2xlaW5lLUvDtm5pZw==?= Cc: Thierry Reding , linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, Alexandre Courbot , linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, Lee Jones , Stephen Warren , Tomi Valkeinen , Bryan Wu , Liam Girdwood , Doug Anderson , Mark Brown , Richard Purdie , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Jingoo Han , linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, Maxime Ripard , Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard , Jacek Anaszewski , linux-leds@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-leds@vger.kernel.org Hi Uwe, On Thu, 2 Jul 2015 09:03:43 +0200 Uwe Kleine-K=C3=B6nig wrote: > Hello Boris, >=20 > On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 10:21:46AM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote: > > This series adds support for atomic PWM update, or ITO, the capabil= ity > > to update all the parameters of a PWM device (enabled/disabled, per= iod, > > duty and polarity) in one go. > on first reading the subject of your series I thought it was about > asserting that the newly set config is active before the call to > pwm_config (et al) returns. That's a problem I addressed a few times = in > the past. I wonder if it's only me or if a different wording should b= e > used for "update all parameters with a single function call". Yep, I can reword it differently. >=20 > But other than that I like the series. Great! Best Regards, Boris --=20 Boris Brezillon, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Boris Brezillon Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2015 07:30:13 +0000 Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/15] pwm: add support for atomic update Message-Id: <20150702093013.66229df5@bbrezillon> List-Id: References: <1435738921-25027-1-git-send-email-boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> <20150702070343.GD11824@pengutronix.de> In-Reply-To: <20150702070343.GD11824@pengutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Hi Uwe, On Thu, 2 Jul 2015 09:03:43 +0200 Uwe Kleine-K=C3=B6nig wrote: > Hello Boris, >=20 > On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 10:21:46AM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote: > > This series adds support for atomic PWM update, or ITO, the capability > > to update all the parameters of a PWM device (enabled/disabled, period, > > duty and polarity) in one go. > on first reading the subject of your series I thought it was about > asserting that the newly set config is active before the call to > pwm_config (et al) returns. That's a problem I addressed a few times in > the past. I wonder if it's only me or if a different wording should be > used for "update all parameters with a single function call". Yep, I can reword it differently. >=20 > But other than that I like the series. Great! Best Regards, Boris --=20 Boris Brezillon, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com