From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] eal: provide functions to access PCI
 config
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2015 09:11:59 -0700
Message-ID: <20150708091159.78e2998a@urahara>
References: <1436314095-21574-1-git-send-email-stephen@networkplumber.org>
 <1436314095-21574-2-git-send-email-stephen@networkplumber.org>
 <d35efa226d95495e804181b2246063d2@HQ1WP-EXMB11.corp.brocade.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>, Stephen Hemminger <shemming@Brocade.com>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mail-pd0-f175.google.com (mail-pd0-f175.google.com
 [209.85.192.175]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1A6B5A58
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed,  8 Jul 2015 18:11:49 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by pdrg1 with SMTP id g1so16627135pdr.2
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 08 Jul 2015 09:11:49 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <d35efa226d95495e804181b2246063d2@HQ1WP-EXMB11.corp.brocade.com>
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

On Wed, 8 Jul 2015 15:04:16 +0000
Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com> wrote:

> 2015-07-07 17:08, Stephen Hemminger:
> > --- a/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/rte_eal_version.map
> > +++ b/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/rte_eal_version.map
> > @@ -98,3 +98,8 @@ DPDK_2.0 {
> >  
> >         local: *;
> >  };
> > +
> > +DPDK_2.1 {
> > +       rte_eal_pci_read_config;
> > +       rte_eal_pci_write_config;
> > +};  
> 
> DPDK_2.0 is missing to make 2.1 node inheriting from 2.0 one.

Do you mean that it is ok to add functions but keep same ABI version?