From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: broonie@kernel.org (Mark Brown) Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 12:08:19 +0100 Subject: [RFC PATCH 14/15] regulator: pwm: implement ->enable(), ->disable() and ->is_enabled methods In-Reply-To: <20150714130222.1bdfedc5@bbrezillon> References: <1435738921-25027-1-git-send-email-boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> <1435738921-25027-15-git-send-email-boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> <20150714105019.GR11162@sirena.org.uk> <20150714130222.1bdfedc5@bbrezillon> Message-ID: <20150714110819.GU11162@sirena.org.uk> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 01:02:22PM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote: > Mark Brown wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 10:22:00AM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote: > > > Implement the ->enable(), ->disable() and ->is_enabled methods and remove > > > the PWM call in ->set_voltage_sel(). > > This doesn't apply, please check and resend. > This series was made on top of Linus' tree (4.2-rc1 IIRC) and patch 14 > and 15 were not meant to be applied without Thierry's approval (they > depend on other changes in the PWM framework). > I can rebase them on top of linux-next (or just on top of Linus' > 4.2-rc2) if Thierry is okay with that, but I don't think rebasing them > on your regulator's for-next branch is a good idea. What is the dependency for the enable patch? -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 473 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 14/15] regulator: pwm: implement ->enable(), ->disable() and ->is_enabled methods Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 12:08:19 +0100 Message-ID: <20150714110819.GU11162@sirena.org.uk> References: <1435738921-25027-1-git-send-email-boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> <1435738921-25027-15-git-send-email-boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> <20150714105019.GR11162@sirena.org.uk> <20150714130222.1bdfedc5@bbrezillon> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="fFZg0b+WaoCdn4Fq" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150714130222.1bdfedc5@bbrezillon> Sender: linux-tegra-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Boris Brezillon Cc: Thierry Reding , linux-pwm-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Liam Girdwood , Bryan Wu , Richard Purdie , Jacek Anaszewski , linux-leds-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard , Tomi Valkeinen , linux-fbdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Stephen Warren , Alexandre Courbot , linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Maxime Ripard , Jingoo Han , Lee Jones , Doug Anderson List-Id: linux-leds@vger.kernel.org --fFZg0b+WaoCdn4Fq Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 01:02:22PM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote: > Mark Brown wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 10:22:00AM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote: > > > Implement the ->enable(), ->disable() and ->is_enabled methods and remove > > > the PWM call in ->set_voltage_sel(). > > This doesn't apply, please check and resend. > This series was made on top of Linus' tree (4.2-rc1 IIRC) and patch 14 > and 15 were not meant to be applied without Thierry's approval (they > depend on other changes in the PWM framework). > I can rebase them on top of linux-next (or just on top of Linus' > 4.2-rc2) if Thierry is okay with that, but I don't think rebasing them > on your regulator's for-next branch is a good idea. What is the dependency for the enable patch? --fFZg0b+WaoCdn4Fq Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJVpO2jAAoJECTWi3JdVIfQCzAH/jtVAxZM4A2VDq6+8+KcbB4Q FHI8enaYP9PYo645nK+Os5OdcAD3mEaVOWgscWVOZC77jJc2EfVhEbOGXFkPVBEY UQiNm2Ho/bAxflmKYO3ejouir17ApUIrOJHE5ED04WqBWWyoUD5EartUF3puL7CV VCUl34VE2tdJ/juFH8RsNUf2r3UJv2mF6Bm+iem5RO46briQFve8PCoFmXqfCyM+ 3b7gHVQdwj3XNPh4MnU7VhB9NpkIT0tEbCHtQoyIOa8uc/aQwfyvrERfhiNHNUMk b1KHUXMH3xjT/TMd8K+glb45vISmS9BY47/h5FYvayAGUnRBI8IcFiSr7U+todI= =CduC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --fFZg0b+WaoCdn4Fq-- From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 11:08:19 +0000 Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 14/15] regulator: pwm: implement ->enable(), ->disable() and ->is_enabled methods Message-Id: <20150714110819.GU11162@sirena.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="fFZg0b+WaoCdn4Fq" List-Id: References: <1435738921-25027-1-git-send-email-boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> <1435738921-25027-15-git-send-email-boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> <20150714105019.GR11162@sirena.org.uk> <20150714130222.1bdfedc5@bbrezillon> In-Reply-To: <20150714130222.1bdfedc5@bbrezillon> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org --fFZg0b+WaoCdn4Fq Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 01:02:22PM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote: > Mark Brown wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 10:22:00AM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote: > > > Implement the ->enable(), ->disable() and ->is_enabled methods and remove > > > the PWM call in ->set_voltage_sel(). > > This doesn't apply, please check and resend. > This series was made on top of Linus' tree (4.2-rc1 IIRC) and patch 14 > and 15 were not meant to be applied without Thierry's approval (they > depend on other changes in the PWM framework). > I can rebase them on top of linux-next (or just on top of Linus' > 4.2-rc2) if Thierry is okay with that, but I don't think rebasing them > on your regulator's for-next branch is a good idea. What is the dependency for the enable patch? --fFZg0b+WaoCdn4Fq Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJVpO2jAAoJECTWi3JdVIfQCzAH/jtVAxZM4A2VDq6+8+KcbB4Q FHI8enaYP9PYo645nK+Os5OdcAD3mEaVOWgscWVOZC77jJc2EfVhEbOGXFkPVBEY UQiNm2Ho/bAxflmKYO3ejouir17ApUIrOJHE5ED04WqBWWyoUD5EartUF3puL7CV VCUl34VE2tdJ/juFH8RsNUf2r3UJv2mF6Bm+iem5RO46briQFve8PCoFmXqfCyM+ 3b7gHVQdwj3XNPh4MnU7VhB9NpkIT0tEbCHtQoyIOa8uc/aQwfyvrERfhiNHNUMk b1KHUXMH3xjT/TMd8K+glb45vISmS9BY47/h5FYvayAGUnRBI8IcFiSr7U+todI= =CduC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --fFZg0b+WaoCdn4Fq--