From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp2.linuxfoundation.org (smtp2.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.36]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5FA2DB8B for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 19:38:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtprelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0074.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.74]) by smtp2.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E49B01DD5A for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 19:38:45 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 15:38:42 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt To: Sasha Levin Message-ID: <20150714153842.7a043946@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: <55A5635D.1020600@oracle.com> References: <55A1407E.5080800@oracle.com> <55A26C5B.8060007@oracle.com> <20150713105210.6e367f4b@noble> <55A33E48.2040202@oracle.com> <20150713142132.08fead4d@gandalf.local.home> <55A45AD8.5010400@oracle.com> <20150713210226.519dedfd@gandalf.local.home> <20150714104623.GQ11162@sirena.org.uk> <55A51548.4040502@oracle.com> <20150714152515.GX11162@sirena.org.uk> <55A52B8B.5060606@oracle.com> <20150714113829.4b618d9a@gandalf.local.home> <55A53074.7040109@oracle.com> <20150714120225.65e489cc@gandalf.local.home> <55A5635D.1020600@oracle.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Linus Torvalds , "ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org" Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [CORE TOPIC] Issues with stable process List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, 14 Jul 2015 15:30:37 -0400 Sasha Levin wrote: > I agree that this would be enough for -stable. > > But wouldn't you agree that the policy of not passing patches in -rc cycles > through -next at all is incorrect? > > I'm fine with not having a minimal time it must live in -next, but I really > think that it should be in -next at some point. I'm not sure I see this as totally necessary. But perhaps this should be a KS topic, as I think this discussion is better resolved as a discussion than over email. -- Steve