All the mail mirrored from lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ken Moffat <zarniwhoop@ntlworld.com>
To: Jeff Epler <jepler@unpythonic.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: make -jN (n>1) ineffective in 4.2.0-rc on AMD Phenom
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 13:28:00 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150715122800.GA14373@milliways> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150715022331.GE70510@unpythonic.net>

On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 09:23:31PM -0500, Jeff Epler wrote:
> GNU Make 4.1 has a problem that causes it to be unable to use the
> desired level of parallelism.  Two people have reported that reverting a
> commit which changes from fork to vfork "fixes" it. (i'm one of them,
> unfortunately posting as anonymous in the tracker).
> 
> Hoewver, if you are also seeing the linux kernel version as relevant to
> producing the problem, that's quite interesting, and the underlying
> cause may be different.  We reproduced the problem on a range of older
> kernels, from 3.2 to 3.18.
> 
> http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?44555
> 
> Jeff

Thanks, but I think this is a different problem, I was probably not
clear : I specify make -j4 and make does indeed run 4 jobs, but it
is only getting the equivalent of 1 CPU instead of 4.  It is
running 4 jobs, but on the equivalent of 1  processor (so this takes
much longer than -j1).

The reason I think it is a different problem is that I upgraded to
make-4.1 in November and everything has been fine until now.

With 'top' from procps-ng-3.3.10 the display can show how active
each CPU is (indeed, I think that is the default) - on earlier
versions of 'top' I think that the output was very different.

ĸen
-- 
This one goes up to eleven!

      reply	other threads:[~2015-07-15 12:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-07-14 23:39 make -jN (n>1) ineffective in 4.2.0-rc on AMD Phenom Ken Moffat
2015-07-15  0:13 ` Ken Moffat
2015-07-15  2:23 ` Jeff Epler
2015-07-15 12:28   ` Ken Moffat [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150715122800.GA14373@milliways \
    --to=zarniwhoop@ntlworld.com \
    --cc=jepler@unpythonic.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.