From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43916) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZFPbq-0004sS-3M for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 12:32:39 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZFPbm-00061O-TF for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 12:32:38 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:40285) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZFPbm-00060x-Op for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 12:32:34 -0400 Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 19:32:31 +0300 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Message-ID: <20150715192933-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com> References: <1436442444-132020-1-git-send-email-imammedo@redhat.com> <20150715171201.05f6bc0d@nial.brq.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150715171201.05f6bc0d@nial.brq.redhat.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 0/7] Fix QEMU crash during memory hotplug with vhost=on List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Igor Mammedov Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, peter.maydell@linaro.org On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 05:12:01PM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote: > On Thu, 9 Jul 2015 13:47:17 +0200 > Igor Mammedov wrote: > > there also is yet another issue with vhost-user. It also has > very low limit on amount of memory regions (if I recall correctly 8) > and it's possible to trigger even without memory hotplug. > one just need to start QEMU with a several -numa memdev= options > to create a necessary amount of memory regions to trigger it. > > lowrisk option to fix it would be increasing limit in vhost-user > backend. > > another option is disabling vhost and fall-back to virtio, > but I don't know much about vhost if it's possible to > to switch it off without loosing packets guest was sending > at the moment and if it will work at all with vhost. With vhost-user you can't fall back to virtio: it's not an accelerator, it's the backend. Updating the protocol to support a bigger table is possible but old remotes won't be able to support it. -- MST