From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pablo Neira Ayuso Subject: Re: [PATCH -next 0/6] Per network namespace netfilter chains Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 13:01:46 +0200 Message-ID: <20150716110146.GA3920@salvia> References: <87616ppt3h.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <87r3pae5hn.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <878uansj4d.fsf_-_@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <20150715172038.GA4319@salvia> <87vbdljifn.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, Stephen Hemminger , Juanjo Ciarlante , Wensong Zhang , Simon Horman , Julian Anastasov , Patrick McHardy , Jozsef Kadlecsik , Jamal Hadi Salim , Steffen Klassert , Herbert Xu , David Miller To: "Eric W. Biederman" Return-path: Received: from mail.us.es ([193.147.175.20]:56673 "EHLO mail.us.es" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752804AbbGPK4E (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Jul 2015 06:56:04 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87vbdljifn.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 03:05:00PM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > Pablo Neira Ayuso writes: [...] > >> There are lots of other possible and desirable cleanups but this one is > >> a core change needed to make the other changes independent small > >> changes. > > > > The state->net field will kill that dev_net(...) ? x : y; all over the > > code, that would be nice. > > Yes it will. I intend to do that after this patchset settles so I am > not dealing with more than one issue at a time. Otherwise there > is too much work at once. Sure, thanks. > > Some comments on your patchset: > > > > * 1/6 netfilter: nf_queue: Don't recompute the hook_list head > > > > I already passed this to current nf as you insisted on getting this, > > and for the sake of correctness, so it's basically already in David's > > net tree. > > I would have expected this patch to be somewhere. I did not see > this change in net-next when I wrote the patchset (which seemed > like a good approximation of the latest thing available). If I > overlooked and the patch has already made it to Dave then my apologies > for being redundant. > > I still don't see this patch in your pending branch. > > Am I missing something? It doesn't show yet in net-next, but it's already in net: http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/davem/net.git/commit/?id=f307170d6e591a48529425b1ed6ca835790995a9 David periodically pulls net into net-next, so it will show there too at some point.