From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1946033AbbGQKqL (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Jul 2015 06:46:11 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:48232 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1945935AbbGQKqI (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Jul 2015 06:46:08 -0400 Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 11:46:05 +0100 From: Will Deacon To: Steven Rostedt Cc: AKASHI Takahiro , Jungseok Lee , Catalin Marinas , "olof@lixom.net" , "broonie@kernel.org" , "david.griego@linaro.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [RFC 2/3] arm64: refactor save_stack_trace() Message-ID: <20150717104605.GK18994@arm.com> References: <20150714093154.4d73e551@gandalf.local.home> <55A5A75A.1060401@linaro.org> <20150714225105.6c1e4f15@gandalf.local.home> <55A646EE.6030402@linaro.org> <20150715105536.42949ea9@gandalf.local.home> <20150715121337.3b31aa84@gandalf.local.home> <55A6FA82.9000901@linaro.org> <55A703F3.8050203@linaro.org> <20150715213818.55c5b3d8@gandalf.local.home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150715213818.55c5b3d8@gandalf.local.home> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Steve, On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 02:38:18AM +0100, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Thu, 16 Jul 2015 10:08:03 +0900 > AKASHI Takahiro wrote: > > > On 07/16/2015 09:27 AM, AKASHI Takahiro wrote: > > > On 07/16/2015 01:13 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > >> On Wed, 15 Jul 2015 10:55:36 -0400 > > >> Steven Rostedt wrote: > > >> > > >> > > >>> I'll take a look at it and try to clean up the code. > > >> > > >> Does the following patch make sense for you? > > > > > > Looks nice. The patch greatly simplifies changes on arm64 side. > > > > As follows: > > > > - Takahiro AKASHI > > > > How should we go forward with this. Want me to make my change to my > tree, and pull this patch in with it? I can set up for a 4.3 release. > > Then if I can get an Acked-by from one of the arm64 maintainers, I can > have this go through my tree? To be honest, I've completely lost track of this thread! Once you and Akashi have settled on a way forward, I'm happy to take a look at anything touching arch/arm64/, but it seems like you're still discussing some aspects of the series atm. Will From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: will.deacon@arm.com (Will Deacon) Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 11:46:05 +0100 Subject: [RFC 2/3] arm64: refactor save_stack_trace() In-Reply-To: <20150715213818.55c5b3d8@gandalf.local.home> References: <20150714093154.4d73e551@gandalf.local.home> <55A5A75A.1060401@linaro.org> <20150714225105.6c1e4f15@gandalf.local.home> <55A646EE.6030402@linaro.org> <20150715105536.42949ea9@gandalf.local.home> <20150715121337.3b31aa84@gandalf.local.home> <55A6FA82.9000901@linaro.org> <55A703F3.8050203@linaro.org> <20150715213818.55c5b3d8@gandalf.local.home> Message-ID: <20150717104605.GK18994@arm.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Steve, On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 02:38:18AM +0100, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Thu, 16 Jul 2015 10:08:03 +0900 > AKASHI Takahiro wrote: > > > On 07/16/2015 09:27 AM, AKASHI Takahiro wrote: > > > On 07/16/2015 01:13 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > >> On Wed, 15 Jul 2015 10:55:36 -0400 > > >> Steven Rostedt wrote: > > >> > > >> > > >>> I'll take a look at it and try to clean up the code. > > >> > > >> Does the following patch make sense for you? > > > > > > Looks nice. The patch greatly simplifies changes on arm64 side. > > > > As follows: > > > > - Takahiro AKASHI > > > > How should we go forward with this. Want me to make my change to my > tree, and pull this patch in with it? I can set up for a 4.3 release. > > Then if I can get an Acked-by from one of the arm64 maintainers, I can > have this go through my tree? To be honest, I've completely lost track of this thread! Once you and Akashi have settled on a way forward, I'm happy to take a look at anything touching arch/arm64/, but it seems like you're still discussing some aspects of the series atm. Will