From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1757051AbbGQMlV (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Fri, 17 Jul 2015 08:41:21 -0400
Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:48777 "EHLO foss.arm.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1756814AbbGQMlT (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 17 Jul 2015 08:41:19 -0400
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 13:40:54 +0100
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Jungseok Lee <jungseoklee85@gmail.com>,
        Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@arm.com>,
        Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@arm.com>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>,
        "broonie@kernel.org" <broonie@kernel.org>,
        "david.griego@linaro.org" <david.griego@linaro.org>,
        "olof@lixom.net" <olof@lixom.net>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 2/3] arm64: refactor save_stack_trace()
Message-ID: <20150717124054.GE26091@leverpostej>
References: <55A646EE.6030402@linaro.org>
 <20150715105536.42949ea9@gandalf.local.home>
 <20150715121337.3b31aa84@gandalf.local.home>
 <55A6FA82.9000901@linaro.org>
 <55A703F3.8050203@linaro.org>
 <A601CC3C-4B09-4D8B-8564-558349D45815@gmail.com>
 <20150716102405.2cc8c406@gandalf.local.home>
 <12F47692-3010-4886-B87D-3D7820609177@gmail.com>
 <20150716113115.45a17f17@gandalf.local.home>
 <20150716121658.7982fdf5@gandalf.local.home>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20150716121658.7982fdf5@gandalf.local.home>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Hi,

> @@ -354,7 +330,7 @@ static int t_show(struct seq_file *m, vo
>  		seq_printf(m, "        Depth    Size   Location"
>  			   "    (%d entries)\n"
>  			   "        -----    ----   --------\n",
> -			   max_stack_trace.nr_entries - 1);
> +			   max_stack_trace.nr_entries);

I believe you'll want the same fix in print_max_stack, given it's a
carbon copy.

Mark

From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: mark.rutland@arm.com (Mark Rutland)
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 13:40:54 +0100
Subject: [RFC 2/3] arm64: refactor save_stack_trace()
In-Reply-To: <20150716121658.7982fdf5@gandalf.local.home>
References: <55A646EE.6030402@linaro.org>
 <20150715105536.42949ea9@gandalf.local.home>
 <20150715121337.3b31aa84@gandalf.local.home>
 <55A6FA82.9000901@linaro.org> <55A703F3.8050203@linaro.org>
 <A601CC3C-4B09-4D8B-8564-558349D45815@gmail.com>
 <20150716102405.2cc8c406@gandalf.local.home>
 <12F47692-3010-4886-B87D-3D7820609177@gmail.com>
 <20150716113115.45a17f17@gandalf.local.home>
 <20150716121658.7982fdf5@gandalf.local.home>
Message-ID: <20150717124054.GE26091@leverpostej>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

Hi,

> @@ -354,7 +330,7 @@ static int t_show(struct seq_file *m, vo
>  		seq_printf(m, "        Depth    Size   Location"
>  			   "    (%d entries)\n"
>  			   "        -----    ----   --------\n",
> -			   max_stack_trace.nr_entries - 1);
> +			   max_stack_trace.nr_entries);

I believe you'll want the same fix in print_max_stack, given it's a
carbon copy.

Mark