From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753814AbbHDQL1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Aug 2015 12:11:27 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.136]:48609 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751242AbbHDQL0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Aug 2015 12:11:26 -0400 Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2015 13:11:23 -0300 From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo To: "Wangnan (F)" Cc: pi3orama , He Kuang , Li Zefan , Alexei Starovoitov , Xia Kaixu , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , Jiri Olsa , David Ahern , Namhyung Kim Subject: Re: perf eBPF patch ordering. was: Re: perf test LLVM was: Re: [GIT PULL 00/39] perf tools: filtering events using eBPF programs Message-ID: <20150804161123.GC3126@kernel.org> References: <20150731203125.GB16700@kernel.org> <55BED407.9090009@huawei.com> <20150803150728.GA3864@kernel.org> <20150803151905.GE3864@kernel.org> <20150803161116.GB5498@kernel.org> <20150803194917.GE5498@kernel.org> <55C04D60.2050101@huawei.com> <55C0966B.5020801@huawei.com> <20150804155557.GB3126@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150804155557.GB3126@kernel.org> X-Url: http://acmel.wordpress.com User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Em Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 12:55:57PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu: > Em Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 06:39:39PM +0800, Wangnan (F) escreveu: > > https://github.com/WangNan0/linux.git ebpf > Ok, but I am checking patch by patch to see if the changes I made are > kept, and for the first one, it wasn't (the second one is the cset in ouch, you now use a branch named "ebpf" whereas before you used "perf/ebpf-for-acme" before, that was what I was looking at now :-\ After I realised that, yes, you kept my changes in the "ebpf" branch, looking there now. - Arnaldo