From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1755958AbbHGCIl (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Thu, 6 Aug 2015 22:08:41 -0400
Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.136]:48835 "EHLO mail.kernel.org"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1755453AbbHGCAH (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 6 Aug 2015 22:00:07 -0400
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2015 12:58:04 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: "Wangnan (F)" <wangnan0@huawei.com>
Cc: pi3orama <pi3orama@163.com>, He Kuang <hekuang@huawei.com>,
        Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>,
        Xia Kaixu <xiakaixu@huawei.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>,
        David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: perf eBPF patch ordering.  was: Re: perf test LLVM was: Re: [GIT
 PULL 00/39] perf tools: filtering events using eBPF programs
Message-ID: <20150806155804.GB6989@kernel.org>
References: <20150803151905.GE3864@kernel.org>
 <DC6736CC-5186-4A36-985A-A3F8BA142AA2@163.com>
 <20150803161116.GB5498@kernel.org>
 <20150803194917.GE5498@kernel.org>
 <55C04D60.2050101@huawei.com>
 <55C0966B.5020801@huawei.com>
 <20150804155557.GB3126@kernel.org>
 <20150804161123.GC3126@kernel.org>
 <55C2BC01.3010000@huawei.com>
 <20150806144652.GA6989@kernel.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20150806144652.GA6989@kernel.org>
X-Url: http://acmel.wordpress.com
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Em Thu, Aug 06, 2015 at 11:46:52AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> Em Thu, Aug 06, 2015 at 09:44:33AM +0800, Wangnan (F) escreveu:
> > Have you tried 'perf test BPF'? Is that okay on your environment?
 
> Freshly checked out from your github repo, 'ebpf' branch, looks good, see
> output below, back to reading patches...

I have replaced the contents of my perf/ebpf branch with what I have so
far read/edited-changelog-comments/compile-tested/tested-to-some-degree,
will continue.

https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/acme/linux.git/log/?h=perf/ebpf

- Arnaldo