From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 17/18] drm/amdgpu: Don't take
 dev->struct_mutex in bo_force_delete
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2015 12:53:02 +0200
Message-ID: <20150810105301.GH1262@ulmo.nvidia.com>
References: <1436477570-4936-1-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
 <1436477570-4936-18-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0569461169=="
Return-path: <intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org>
In-Reply-To: <1436477570-4936-18-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/options/intel-gfx>,
 <mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx>
List-Post: <mailto:intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
List-Help: <mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx>,
 <mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org
Sender: "Intel-gfx" <intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>, Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>, Christian =?utf-8?B?S8O2bmln?= <christian.koenig@amd.com>, DRI Development <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
List-Id: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org


--===============0569461169==
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="PNpeiK4tTqhYOExY"
Content-Disposition: inline


--PNpeiK4tTqhYOExY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 11:32:49PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> It really doesn't protect anything which doesn't have other locks
> already. Also this is run from driver unload code so not much need for
> locks anyway.
>=20
> Same changes as for readone really.

s/radeone/radeon/

Otherwise:

Reviewed-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>

--PNpeiK4tTqhYOExY
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=SbPq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--PNpeiK4tTqhYOExY--

--===============0569461169==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Disposition: inline

X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18KSW50ZWwtZ2Z4
IG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdApJbnRlbC1nZnhAbGlzdHMuZnJlZWRlc2t0b3Aub3JnCmh0dHA6Ly9saXN0
cy5mcmVlZGVza3RvcC5vcmcvbWFpbG1hbi9saXN0aW5mby9pbnRlbC1nZngK

--===============0569461169==--