From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: ubraun@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: utz.bacher@de.ibm.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com,
heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com, ursula.braun@de.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 net-next 0/2] net: implement SMC-R solution
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2015 11:18:49 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150825.111849.1251755515298926543.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1440156629-35691-1-git-send-email-ubraun@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
From: Ursula Braun <ubraun@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2015 13:30:27 +0200
> this is V4 of my SMC-R patches:
> Since you are asking for a solution "100% in our own separate module
> with our own can of worms", we have to give up the transparent detection
> whether a communication peer can do SMC-R or not (this has been the
> purpose of the rejected TCP hooks). Instead, we want just the new
> self-contained SMC-R socket family added to the kernel.
> By the way, since August 2015 the SMC-R Informational RFC is no longer
> a draft, but published as RFC7609.
The tcp_set_keepalive() layering hack is still beyond what I'm willing
to apply, sorry.
Also, as a coding style note, all of your code needs to be adjusted to
declare local function variables in "reverse christimas tree" order,
that is longest line to shortest.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-25 18:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-14 12:42 [PATCH V2 net-next 0/3] net: implement SMC-R solution Ursula Braun
2015-07-14 12:42 ` [PATCH V2 net-next 1/3] tcp: introduce TCP experimental option for SMC Ursula Braun
2015-07-16 4:28 ` David Miller
2015-07-22 8:59 ` [PATCH V3 net-next 0/5] net: implement SMC-R solution Ursula Braun
2015-07-22 8:59 ` [PATCH V3 net-next 1/5] tcp: TCP experimental option for SMC - definitions Ursula Braun
2015-07-22 8:59 ` [PATCH V3 net-next 2/5] tcp: TCP experimental option for SMC - TCP hooks Ursula Braun
2015-07-22 8:59 ` [PATCH V3 net-next 3/5] net: introduce socket family constants Ursula Braun
2015-07-22 8:59 ` [PATCH V3 net-next 4/5] smc: introduce socket family AF_SMC Ursula Braun
2015-07-22 8:59 ` [PATCH V3 net-next 5/5] smc: increase / decrease static key Ursula Braun
2015-07-26 23:15 ` [PATCH V3 net-next 0/5] net: implement SMC-R solution David Miller
2015-07-31 19:04 ` Ursula Braun
2015-08-21 11:30 ` [PATCH V4 net-next 0/2] " Ursula Braun
2015-08-21 11:30 ` [PATCH V4 net-next 1/2] net: introduce socket family constants Ursula Braun
2015-08-21 11:30 ` [PATCH V4 net-next 2/2] smc: introduce socket family AF_SMC Ursula Braun
2015-08-25 18:18 ` David Miller [this message]
2015-07-14 12:42 ` [PATCH V2 net-next 2/3] net: introduce socket family constants Ursula Braun
2015-07-16 4:29 ` David Miller
2015-07-14 12:42 ` [PATCH V2 net-next 3/3] smc: introduce socket family AF_SMC Ursula Braun
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150825.111849.1251755515298926543.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=ubraun@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=ursula.braun@de.ibm.com \
--cc=utz.bacher@de.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.