All the mail mirrored from lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
To: Waiman Long <waiman.long@hpe.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Scott J Norton <scott.norton@hp.com>,
	Douglas Hatch <doug.hatch@hp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 4/6] locking/pvqspinlock: Collect slowpath lock statistics
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2015 14:41:05 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150914214105.GH19736@linux-q0g1.site> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55F6E6F2.10102@hpe.com>

On Mon, 14 Sep 2015, Waiman Long wrote:

>You can't use debugfs if we want to have per-cpu stats. We will have 
>to use sysfs instead. This will require more code changes. It is 
>certainly doable, but we have to choose between simplicity and 
>performance overhead. Right now, I am assuming that lock PV lockstat 
>is used primarily for debugging purpose and won't be enabled on 
>production system. If we want to have this capability in production 
>systems, we will certainly need to change it to per-cpu stats and use 
>sysfs instead.
>
>The original PV ticketlock code used debugfs and I was just following 
>its footstep. Do you think it is worthwhile to have this capability 
>available on production system by default?

If we can prove that the overhead is small enough, and do it correctly
(ie see how we do vmstats), it would be _very_ useful data to have
enabled by default for debugging performance issues; methinks. But right
now we have nowhere near that kind of data, not even with this atomic
variant -- although I recall you did mention a workload in a previous
iteration (which would be good to have in the changelog).

  reply	other threads:[~2015-09-14 21:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-09-11 18:37 [PATCH v6 0/6] locking/qspinlock: Enhance pvqspinlock performance Waiman Long
2015-09-11 18:37 ` [PATCH v6 1/6] locking/qspinlock: relaxes cmpxchg & xchg ops in native code Waiman Long
2015-09-11 22:27   ` Davidlohr Bueso
2015-09-14 12:06     ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-09-14 18:40       ` Waiman Long
2015-09-14 15:16     ` Waiman Long
2015-09-11 18:37 ` [PATCH v6 2/6] locking/pvqspinlock: Unconditional PV kick with _Q_SLOW_VAL Waiman Long
2015-09-18  8:50   ` [tip:locking/core] locking/pvqspinlock: Kick the PV CPU unconditionally when _Q_SLOW_VAL tip-bot for Waiman Long
2015-09-11 18:37 ` [PATCH v6 3/6] locking/pvqspinlock, x86: Optimize PV unlock code path Waiman Long
2015-09-11 18:37 ` [PATCH v6 4/6] locking/pvqspinlock: Collect slowpath lock statistics Waiman Long
2015-09-11 23:13   ` Davidlohr Bueso
2015-09-14 15:25     ` Waiman Long
2015-09-14 21:41       ` Davidlohr Bueso [this message]
2015-09-15  3:47         ` Waiman Long
2015-09-11 18:37 ` [PATCH v6 5/6] locking/pvqspinlock: Allow 1 lock stealing attempt Waiman Long
2015-09-14 13:57   ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-09-14 19:02     ` Waiman Long
2015-09-14 14:00   ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-09-14 19:15     ` Waiman Long
2015-09-14 19:38       ` Waiman Long
2015-09-15  8:24       ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-09-15 15:29         ` Waiman Long
2015-09-16 15:01           ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-09-17 15:08             ` Waiman Long
2015-09-14 14:04   ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-09-14 19:19     ` Waiman Long
2015-09-11 18:37 ` [PATCH v6 6/6] locking/pvqspinlock: Queue node adaptive spinning Waiman Long
2015-09-14 14:10   ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-09-14 19:37     ` Waiman Long
2015-09-15  8:38       ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-09-15 15:32         ` Waiman Long
2015-09-16 15:03           ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150914214105.GH19736@linux-q0g1.site \
    --to=dave@stgolabs.net \
    --cc=doug.hatch@hp.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=scott.norton@hp.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=waiman.long@hpe.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.