On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 12:06:49AM +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> On 09/14/2015 10:11 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> >Hash: SHA256
> >
> >
> >
> >On 14/09/2015 13:45, David Gibson wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>=== * There is no way for a child to determine what its parent
> >>>>is.  It is not * a bidirectional relationship.  This is by
> >>>>design. ===
> >>>>
> >>>>This part always confused me as there is "Object *parent" in
> >>>>the "struct Object". So there is way to determine but it must
> >>>>not be used? Is it debug only?
> >>>>
> >>>>Anyway, all members of the Object class are under /*< private
> >>>>>*/ so they should not be accesses in sPAPR code, I believe.
> >>Ah, good point, I missed that.  I guess we have to keep the owner
> >>field, redundant though it seems.  Blech.
> >
> >I think the comment is wrong or at least inaccurate; it only applies
> >to the external QOM interface.
> 
> 
> Is this case external?

I'm assyming by "external" Paolo means outside qemu - i.e. access via
the qapi monitor.

> Originally I was looking for a object_get_parent() but it is not there so I
> decided that the comment is correct or I just fail to understand it :)
> 
> 
> >The patch is a good idea, even though
> >OBJECT(x)->y traditionally is not used (instead you assign OBJECT(x) to
> >a different Object* variable).
> 
> 
> 

-- 
David Gibson			| I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au	| minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
				| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson