From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from lists.s-osg.org ([54.187.51.154]:53820 "EHLO lists.s-osg.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753076AbbKLRlz (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Nov 2015 12:41:55 -0500 Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2015 15:41:50 -0200 From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab To: Alec Leamas Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Message-ID: <20151112154150.33a1979a@recife.lan> In-Reply-To: <5644CD07.6020303@gmail.com> References: <5644AD42.4060904@users.sourceforge.net> <20151112152022.4f212b97@recife.lan> <5644CD07.6020303@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Em Thu, 12 Nov 2015 18:31:51 +0100 Alec Leamas escreveu: > On 12/11/15 18:20, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > > Em Thu, 12 Nov 2015 18:16:18 +0300 > > Alberto Mardegan escreveu: > > > Complaining doesn't help at all. We don't read the mailing list to > > check for new patches. Instead, we look for them at: > > https://patchwork.linuxtv.org/project/linux-media/list/ > > > > All patches that goes to the ML are automatically stored there, and will be > > handled by one of the (sub-)maintainers. > > > However, if the emailer breaks the patch (with was the case of the > > "tv tuner max2165..." patch), patchwork won't recognize it as a > > patch, and we'll only see the e-mail by accident. > > Ah... that explains why nobody cares about my patch[1]... Is there any > way around picky emailers? Use a good one ;) Here, I use claws-mail, with works fine if configured to send text-only e-mails and to not break long lines. Another alternative is to use git to send the email with something like: git send-email HEAD~1 --annotate That requires some setup at the .git/config file: https://git-scm.com/docs/git-send-email As you use gmail, you could add at the .git/config: [sendemail] smtpEncryption = tls smtpServer = smtp.gmail.com smtpUser = yourname@gmail.com smtpServerPort = 587 > Is putting the patch in an attachment OK? No, because it doesn't make easy for people to reply with comments. Regards, Mauro