From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752843AbbLIRVt (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Dec 2015 12:21:49 -0500 Received: from one.firstfloor.org ([193.170.194.197]:39341 "EHLO one.firstfloor.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752509AbbLIRVr (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Dec 2015 12:21:47 -0500 Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2015 18:21:45 +0100 From: Andi Kleen To: Stephane Eranian Cc: Andi Kleen , Peter Zijlstra , Jiri Olsa , Yunlong Song , Don Zickus , David Ahern , =?iso-8859-1?Q?Fr=E9d=E9ric?= Weisbecker , Joe Mario , Mike Galbraith , Paul Mackerras , Richard Fowles , "acme@kernel.org >> Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo" , "mingo@redhat.com" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Jiri Olsa , "wangnan0@huawei.com >> Wang Nan" , Richard Fowles , Namhyung Kim Subject: Re: [Questions] perf c2c: What's the current status of perf c2c? Message-ID: <20151209172145.GQ15533@two.firstfloor.org> References: <5667A8D4.4090601@huawei.com> <20151209080440.GA17211@krava.brq.redhat.com> <20151209093402.GM6356@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20151209165807.GP15533@two.firstfloor.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > If I recall the c2c tool is giving you more than the bouncing line. It shows you > the offset inside the line and the participating CPUs. On Haswell and later you could get the same with the normal address reporting. The events above support DLA. -Andi -- ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.