* [PATCH igt] intel-ci: Exercise all basic relocation targets
@ 2017-02-04 16:20 Chris Wilson
2017-02-21 11:09 ` Chris Wilson
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Chris Wilson @ 2017-02-04 16:20 UTC (permalink / raw
To: intel-gfx
There are several possible relocation methods the kernel uses depending
upon the placement and caching of the buffers. Lots of different code
paths not being covered by BAT - expand the testing to cover them. Even
though there are quite a few paths, individually they are each very
fast.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Petri Latvala <petri.latvala@intel.com>
---
tests/intel-ci/fast-feedback.testlist | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 25 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tests/intel-ci/fast-feedback.testlist b/tests/intel-ci/fast-feedback.testlist
index a0c3f848..667d77d7 100644
--- a/tests/intel-ci/fast-feedback.testlist
+++ b/tests/intel-ci/fast-feedback.testlist
@@ -70,6 +70,31 @@ igt@gem_exec_parse@basic-allowed
igt@gem_exec_parse@basic-rejected
igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-cpu
igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-gtt
+igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-cpu-gtt
+igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-gtt-cpu
+igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-cpu-read
+igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-gtt-read
+igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-write-cpu
+igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-write-gtt
+igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-write-read
+igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-cpu-noreloc
+igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-gtt-noreloc
+igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-cpu-gtt-noreloc
+igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-gtt-cpu-noreloc
+igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-cpu-read-noreloc
+igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-gtt-read-noreloc
+igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-write-cpu-noreloc
+igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-write-gtt-noreloc
+igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-write-read-noreloc
+igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-cpu-active
+igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-gtt-active
+igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-cpu-gtt-active
+igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-gtt-cpu-active
+igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-cpu-read-active
+igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-gtt-read-active
+igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-write-cpu-active
+igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-write-gtt-active
+igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-write-read-active
igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-softpin
igt@gem_exec_store@basic-all
igt@gem_exec_store@basic-blt
--
2.11.0
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH igt] intel-ci: Exercise all basic relocation targets
2017-02-04 16:20 [PATCH igt] intel-ci: Exercise all basic relocation targets Chris Wilson
@ 2017-02-21 11:09 ` Chris Wilson
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Chris Wilson @ 2017-02-21 11:09 UTC (permalink / raw
To: intel-gfx
On Sat, Feb 04, 2017 at 04:20:27PM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
> There are several possible relocation methods the kernel uses depending
> upon the placement and caching of the buffers. Lots of different code
> paths not being covered by BAT - expand the testing to cover them. Even
> though there are quite a few paths, individually they are each very
> fast.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Petri Latvala <petri.latvala@intel.com>
Ping? All 20 together shouldn't take longer than a 2-3s.
-Chris
--
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-02-21 11:10 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-02-04 16:20 [PATCH igt] intel-ci: Exercise all basic relocation targets Chris Wilson
2017-02-21 11:09 ` Chris Wilson
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.