* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/32] 5.10.12-rc1 review
[not found] <20210129105912.628174874@linuxfoundation.org>
@ 2021-01-29 18:22 ` Naresh Kamboju
2021-01-30 13:01 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-01-30 13:50 ` Jon Hunter
2021-01-29 18:23 ` Guenter Roeck
[not found] ` <20210129125914.GA23853@duo.ucw.cz>
2 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Naresh Kamboju @ 2021-01-29 18:22 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: open list, Shuah Khan, patches, lkft-triage, linux-stable, pavel,
Andrew Morton, Linus Torvalds, Guenter Roeck
On Fri, 29 Jan 2021 at 16:47, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.12 release.
> There are 32 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sun, 31 Jan 2021 10:59:01 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.12-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
Summary
------------------------------------------------------------------------
kernel: 5.10.12-rc1
git repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
git branch: linux-5.10.y
git commit: 324e71045b28705e935d8136fac983c6aa808e06
git describe: v5.10.11-33-g324e71045b28
Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y/build/v5.10.11-33-g324e71045b28
No regressions (compared to build v5.10.11)
No fixes (compared to build v5.10.11)
Ran 54244 total tests in the following environments and test suites.
Environments
--------------
- arc
- arm
- arm64
- dragonboard-410c
- hi6220-hikey
- i386
- juno-r2
- juno-r2-compat
- juno-r2-kasan
- mips
- nxp-ls2088
- nxp-ls2088-64k_page_size
- parisc
- powerpc
- qemu-arm-clang
- qemu-arm64-clang
- qemu-arm64-kasan
- qemu-i386-clang
- qemu-x86_64-clang
- qemu-x86_64-kasan
- qemu-x86_64-kcsan
- qemu_arm
- qemu_arm64
- qemu_arm64-compat
- qemu_i386
- qemu_x86_64
- qemu_x86_64-compat
- riscv
- s390
- sh
- sparc
- x15
- x86
- x86-kasan
- x86_64
Test Suites
-----------
* build
* linux-log-parser
* install-android-platform-tools-r2600
* ltp-containers-tests
* ltp-cve-tests
* ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests
* ltp-filecaps-tests
* ltp-fs_bind-tests
* ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests
* ltp-fsx-tests
* ltp-hugetlb-tests
* ltp-mm-tests
* ltp-nptl-tests
* ltp-pty-tests
* ltp-sched-tests
* ltp-securebits-tests
* ltp-syscalls-tests
* v4l2-compliance
* kselftest
* network-basic-tests
* perf
* libhugetlbfs
* ltp-cap_bounds-tests
* ltp-commands-tests
* ltp-controllers-tests
* ltp-cpuhotplug-tests
* ltp-crypto-tests
* ltp-dio-tests
* ltp-fs-tests
* ltp-io-tests
* ltp-ipc-tests
* ltp-math-tests
* ltp-open-posix-tests
* ltp-tracing-tests
* kvm-unit-tests
* fwts
* kunit
* rcutorture
* kselftest-vsyscall-mode-native
* kselftest-vsyscall-mode-none
--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/32] 5.10.12-rc1 review
[not found] <20210129105912.628174874@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-01-29 18:22 ` [PATCH 5.10 00/32] 5.10.12-rc1 review Naresh Kamboju
@ 2021-01-29 18:23 ` Guenter Roeck
2021-01-30 13:01 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
[not found] ` <20210129125914.GA23853@duo.ucw.cz>
2 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Guenter Roeck @ 2021-01-29 18:23 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel,
stable
On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 12:07:10PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.12 release.
> There are 32 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sun, 31 Jan 2021 10:59:01 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
Build results:
total: 154 pass: 154 fail: 0
Qemu test results:
total: 427 pass: 427 fail: 0
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Guenter
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/32] 5.10.12-rc1 review
[not found] ` <20210129125914.GA23853@duo.ucw.cz>
@ 2021-01-30 13:00 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman @ 2021-01-30 13:00 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Pavel Machek
Cc: linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches, lkft-triage,
stable
On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 01:59:14PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Fri 2021-01-29 12:07:10, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.12 release.
> > There are 32 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
>
> CIP testing did not find any problems here:
>
> https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-5.10.y
>
> Tested-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) <pavel@denx.de>
Thanks for testing these and letting me know.
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/32] 5.10.12-rc1 review
2021-01-29 18:22 ` [PATCH 5.10 00/32] 5.10.12-rc1 review Naresh Kamboju
@ 2021-01-30 13:01 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-01-30 13:50 ` Jon Hunter
1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman @ 2021-01-30 13:01 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Naresh Kamboju
Cc: open list, Shuah Khan, patches, lkft-triage, linux-stable, pavel,
Andrew Morton, Linus Torvalds, Guenter Roeck
On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 11:52:04PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Jan 2021 at 16:47, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.12 release.
> > There are 32 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Sun, 31 Jan 2021 10:59:01 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.12-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
>
>
> Results from Linaro’s test farm.
> No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
>
> Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
Thanks for testing these and letting me know.
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/32] 5.10.12-rc1 review
2021-01-29 18:23 ` Guenter Roeck
@ 2021-01-30 13:01 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman @ 2021-01-30 13:01 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Guenter Roeck
Cc: linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel,
stable
On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 10:23:16AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 12:07:10PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.12 release.
> > There are 32 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Sun, 31 Jan 2021 10:59:01 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
>
> Build results:
> total: 154 pass: 154 fail: 0
> Qemu test results:
> total: 427 pass: 427 fail: 0
>
> Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Thanks for testing them all and letting me know.
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/32] 5.10.12-rc1 review
2021-01-29 18:22 ` [PATCH 5.10 00/32] 5.10.12-rc1 review Naresh Kamboju
2021-01-30 13:01 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2021-01-30 13:50 ` Jon Hunter
1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jon Hunter @ 2021-01-30 13:50 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Naresh Kamboju, Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: open list, Shuah Khan, patches, lkft-triage, linux-stable, pavel,
Andrew Morton, Linus Torvalds, Guenter Roeck
On 29/01/2021 18:22, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Jan 2021 at 16:47, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>>
>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.12 release.
>> There are 32 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>> let me know.
Replying here because I don't have the original.
Test results for stable-v5.10:
12 builds: 12 pass, 0 fail
26 boots: 26 pass, 0 fail
65 tests: 65 pass, 0 fail
Linux version: 5.10.12-rc1-g324e71045b28
Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra20-ventana,
tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra210-p3450-0000,
tegra30-cardhu-a04
Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Jon
--
nvpublic
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-01-30 13:51 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20210129105912.628174874@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-01-29 18:22 ` [PATCH 5.10 00/32] 5.10.12-rc1 review Naresh Kamboju
2021-01-30 13:01 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-01-30 13:50 ` Jon Hunter
2021-01-29 18:23 ` Guenter Roeck
2021-01-30 13:01 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
[not found] ` <20210129125914.GA23853@duo.ucw.cz>
2021-01-30 13:00 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.