From: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
To: Tobias Waldekranz <tobias@waldekranz.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, andrew@lunn.ch,
vivien.didelot@gmail.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 4/5] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Offload bridge learning flag
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2021 21:29:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210317192929.qviweve6acjzrjcq@skbuf> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87k0q5obz9.fsf@waldekranz.com>
On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 07:45:46PM +0100, Tobias Waldekranz wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 16:12, Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 10:13:59PM +0100, Tobias Waldekranz wrote:
> >> + if (flags.mask & BR_LEARNING) {
> >> + u16 pav = (flags.val & BR_LEARNING) ? (1 << port) : 0;
> >> +
> >> + err = mv88e6xxx_port_set_assoc_vector(chip, port, pav);
> >> + if (err)
> >> + goto out;
> >> + }
> >> +
> >
> > If flags.val & BR_LEARNING is off, could you please call
> > mv88e6xxx_port_fast_age too? This ensures that existing ATU entries that
> > were automatically learned are purged.
>
> This opened up another can of worms.
>
> It turns out that the hardware is incapable of fast aging a LAG.
You sound pretty definitive about it, do you know why?
> I can see two workarounds. Both are awful in their own special ways:
>
> 1. Iterate over all entries of all FIDs in the ATU, removing all
> matching dynamic entries. This will accomplish the same thing, but it
> is a very expensive operation, and having that in the control path of
> STP does not feel quite right.
When does it ever feel right? :)
I think of it like a faster 'bridge fdb' command (since 'bridge fdb'
traverses the ATU super inefficiently, it dumps the whole table for each
port).
On my system with 24 mv88e6xxx ports, 'time bridge fdb' takes around 34
seconds. So that means a 'slow age' will take around 1.4 seconds for a
single LAG.
On the other hand, on my system with 7 sja1105 ports, I have no choice
but to do slow ageing - the hardware simply doesn't have the concept of
'fast ageing'. There, 'time bridge fdb' returns 1.781s, so I expect a
slow age would take around 0.25 seconds. Of course I'm not happy about
it, but I think I'll bite the bullet.
> 2. Flushing all dynamic entries in the entire ATU. Fast, but obviously
> results in a period of lots of flooded packets.
This one seems like an overreaction to me. Would that even solve the
problem? Couly you destroy and re-create the trunk?
> Any opinion on which approach you think would hurt less? Or, even
> better, if there is a third way that I have missed.
>
> For this series I am leaning towards making mv88e6xxx_port_fast_age a
> no-op for LAG ports. We could then come back to this problem when we add
> other LAG-related FDB operations like static FDB entries. Acceptable?
Yeah, I guess that's fair.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-17 19:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-15 21:13 [PATCH net-next 0/5] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Offload bridge port flags Tobias Waldekranz
2021-03-15 21:13 ` [PATCH net-next 1/5] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Provide generic VTU iterator Tobias Waldekranz
2021-03-16 8:42 ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-03-17 9:41 ` Tobias Waldekranz
2021-03-18 1:34 ` Andrew Lunn
2021-03-15 21:13 ` [PATCH net-next 2/5] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Remove some bureaucracy around querying the VTU Tobias Waldekranz
2021-03-16 9:17 ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-03-17 9:46 ` Tobias Waldekranz
2021-03-15 21:13 ` [PATCH net-next 3/5] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Flood all traffic classes on standalone ports Tobias Waldekranz
2021-03-16 9:19 ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-03-17 22:33 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-03-18 1:38 ` Andrew Lunn
2021-03-15 21:13 ` [PATCH net-next 4/5] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Offload bridge learning flag Tobias Waldekranz
2021-03-16 9:27 ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-03-17 9:57 ` Tobias Waldekranz
2021-03-17 14:12 ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-03-17 18:45 ` Tobias Waldekranz
2021-03-17 19:29 ` Vladimir Oltean [this message]
2021-03-17 22:32 ` Tobias Waldekranz
2021-03-15 21:14 ` [PATCH net-next 5/5] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Offload bridge broadcast flooding flag Tobias Waldekranz
2021-03-16 9:39 ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-03-17 11:14 ` Tobias Waldekranz
2021-03-17 11:24 ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-03-18 1:50 ` Andrew Lunn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210317192929.qviweve6acjzrjcq@skbuf \
--to=olteanv@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tobias@waldekranz.com \
--cc=vivien.didelot@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.