From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B21522F9B for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 12:40:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 86EE6613F6; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 12:40:51 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1619095252; bh=lJRSxiLNkyRDmrY1vBkAqNHhFU4NKAVwGBC0fk19PJI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=E/oE9ss65xuMj8zVnCSxCjmpoia4vWczRbo9NoNPvGlz5rdZsiKknBuyJ7UcOflIe rl2tGoxWnWXTgjl5TM7tmTuE7MRPJZHvKKjSZVMhRgyFqM8W4nixOgcT5dqlbVWP0l sRscH8hWXmYJpg5jrGp5r1XD9xZP77NYPCfMRp8Y1zj3kPfKfP8mAKd520Y1jpFfCP ueCcFDCVu9Igs7/ORVcj9mUFcB5RtJIKUGHSckQHnf6AsIb5PXslAwQzBFHNpy4CK1 t12YgKjyOCK1/JSUaHfiTO54BifwEiH2syV0PmS9S8IFGgqKZAvSXtZksbs6cqAIYl aKyEw8fwZhIxQ== Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2021 13:40:23 +0100 From: Mark Brown To: Leon Romanovsky Cc: James Bottomley , ksummit@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [MAINTAINER SUMMIT] Rethinking the acceptance policy for "trivial" patches Message-ID: <20210422124023.GD4572@sirena.org.uk> References: X-Mailing-List: ksummit@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="VMt1DrMGOVs3KQwf" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Cookie: Jesus is my POSTMASTER GENERAL ... User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) --VMt1DrMGOVs3KQwf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 07:21:26AM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > While we are talking about policies, I would like to raise another bad > practice that is done by even seasoned developers - sending patches with > carefully crafted and filtered TO and CC. > This practice causes to get out of context patches without ability to > see whole picture and the worse part that it divides feedback to > "islands" without ability to agree or disagree with the feedback. The flip side of copying everyone on everything is that especially for serieses which aren't just repetitive changes this gets really noisy really quickly and things end up just not getting read. --VMt1DrMGOVs3KQwf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAmCBbrYACgkQJNaLcl1U h9AWZgf/coAyxWwIXXeAYX3vyPOnuyYj688Eau3S5neUcMxruYrmtXMqtrqP78hz w2B2Aq+eJdygj831HXUmPuL6o1ItOZrAa7i3zELHFIN8nMVcjoXcQq6m9h2Uw0oC jX8C6mRd1bsmxNhvRP03h8/JcVs3Bi2Lp3u8uxSOB5XE5U2a70cB1etEQylSSF0f bG2K6Y8gasfLHVUXR7pQDnbAtz/OiuL7MwTk0rwPe6XBTefO62+XleutcMN+m8Xw VXa0PLqXvtjC/P3Ob8sZbUAZm8irUM/JnGcpFkPxjmlhzDedQ5kxU4X4AKnxehne WHw5SI8kcXwjalJNFnFAq2ZoKEprgw== =mb4X -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --VMt1DrMGOVs3KQwf--