All the mail mirrored from lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
To: rcu@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com,
	mingo@kernel.org, jiangshanlai@gmail.com,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com,
	josh@joshtriplett.org, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org,
	rostedt@goodmis.org, dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com,
	fweisbec@gmail.com, oleg@redhat.com, joel@joelfernandes.org,
	Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
	"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
	Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@codeaurora.org>,
	Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 5/6] srcu: Fix broken node geometry after early ssp init
Date: Tue, 11 May 2021 16:07:44 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210511230745.2894650-5-paulmck@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210511230720.GA2894512@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1>

From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>

An srcu_struct structure that is initialized before rcu_init_geometry()
will have its srcu_node hierarchy based on CONFIG_NR_CPUS.  Once
rcu_init_geometry() is called, this hierarchy is compressed as needed
for the actual maximum number of CPUs for this system.

Later on, that srcu_struct structure is confused, sometimes referring
to its initial CONFIG_NR_CPUS-based hierarchy, and sometimes instead
to the new num_possible_cpus() hierarchy.  For example, each of its
->mynode fields continues to reference the original leaf rcu_node
structures, some of which might no longer exist.  On the other hand,
srcu_for_each_node_breadth_first() traverses to the new node hierarchy.

There are at least two bad possible outcomes to this:

1) a) A callback enqueued early on an srcu_data structure (call it
      *sdp) is recorded pending on sdp->mynode->srcu_data_have_cbs in
      srcu_funnel_gp_start() with sdp->mynode pointing to a deep leaf
      (say 3 levels).

   b) The grace period ends after rcu_init_geometry() shrinks the
      nodes level to a single one.  srcu_gp_end() walks through the new
      srcu_node hierarchy without ever reaching the old leaves so the
      callback is never executed.

   This is easily reproduced on an 8 CPUs machine with CONFIG_NR_CPUS >= 32
   and "rcupdate.rcu_self_test=1". The srcu_barrier() after early tests
   verification never completes and the boot hangs:

	[ 5413.141029] INFO: task swapper/0:1 blocked for more than 4915 seconds.
	[ 5413.147564]       Not tainted 5.12.0-rc4+ #28
	[ 5413.151927] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
	[ 5413.159753] task:swapper/0       state:D stack:    0 pid:    1 ppid:     0 flags:0x00004000
	[ 5413.168099] Call Trace:
	[ 5413.170555]  __schedule+0x36c/0x930
	[ 5413.174057]  ? wait_for_completion+0x88/0x110
	[ 5413.178423]  schedule+0x46/0xf0
	[ 5413.181575]  schedule_timeout+0x284/0x380
	[ 5413.185591]  ? wait_for_completion+0x88/0x110
	[ 5413.189957]  ? mark_held_locks+0x61/0x80
	[ 5413.193882]  ? mark_held_locks+0x61/0x80
	[ 5413.197809]  ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x24/0x50
	[ 5413.202173]  ? wait_for_completion+0x88/0x110
	[ 5413.206535]  wait_for_completion+0xb4/0x110
	[ 5413.210724]  ? srcu_torture_stats_print+0x110/0x110
	[ 5413.215610]  srcu_barrier+0x187/0x200
	[ 5413.219277]  ? rcu_tasks_verify_self_tests+0x50/0x50
	[ 5413.224244]  ? rdinit_setup+0x2b/0x2b
	[ 5413.227907]  rcu_verify_early_boot_tests+0x2d/0x40
	[ 5413.232700]  do_one_initcall+0x63/0x310
	[ 5413.236541]  ? rdinit_setup+0x2b/0x2b
	[ 5413.240207]  ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x52/0x80
	[ 5413.244912]  kernel_init_freeable+0x253/0x28f
	[ 5413.249273]  ? rest_init+0x250/0x250
	[ 5413.252846]  kernel_init+0xa/0x110
	[ 5413.256257]  ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30

2) An srcu_struct structure that is initialized before rcu_init_geometry()
   and used afterward will always have stale rdp->mynode references,
   resulting in callbacks to be missed in srcu_gp_end(), just like in
   the previous scenario.

This commit therefore causes init_srcu_struct_nodes to initialize the
geometry, if needed.  This ensures that the srcu_node hierarchy is
properly built and distributed from the get-go.

Suggested-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>
Cc: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
Cc: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Cc: Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
---
 kernel/rcu/rcu.h      |  2 ++
 kernel/rcu/srcutree.c |  3 +++
 kernel/rcu/tree.c     | 16 +++++++++++++++-
 3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/rcu.h b/kernel/rcu/rcu.h
index ca3f2af32bf8..28de768bd875 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/rcu.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/rcu.h
@@ -308,6 +308,8 @@ static inline void rcu_init_levelspread(int *levelspread, const int *levelcnt)
 	}
 }
 
+extern void rcu_init_geometry(void);
+
 /* Returns a pointer to the first leaf rcu_node structure. */
 #define rcu_first_leaf_node() (rcu_state.level[rcu_num_lvls - 1])
 
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c b/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
index 9ec35c158740..5fdbde687feb 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
@@ -90,6 +90,9 @@ static void init_srcu_struct_nodes(struct srcu_struct *ssp)
 	struct srcu_node *snp;
 	struct srcu_node *snp_first;
 
+	/* Initialize geometry if it has not already been initialized. */
+	rcu_init_geometry();
+
 	/* Work out the overall tree geometry. */
 	ssp->level[0] = &ssp->node[0];
 	for (i = 1; i < rcu_num_lvls; i++)
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index c35b15229cff..0420b23fc9d0 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -4582,11 +4582,25 @@ static void __init rcu_init_one(void)
  * replace the definitions in tree.h because those are needed to size
  * the ->node array in the rcu_state structure.
  */
-static void __init rcu_init_geometry(void)
+void rcu_init_geometry(void)
 {
 	ulong d;
 	int i;
+	static unsigned long old_nr_cpu_ids;
 	int rcu_capacity[RCU_NUM_LVLS];
+	static bool initialized;
+
+	if (initialized) {
+		/*
+		 * Warn if setup_nr_cpu_ids() had not yet been invoked,
+		 * unless nr_cpus_ids == NR_CPUS, in which case who cares?
+		 */
+		WARN_ON_ONCE(old_nr_cpu_ids != nr_cpu_ids);
+		return;
+	}
+
+	old_nr_cpu_ids = nr_cpu_ids;
+	initialized = true;
 
 	/*
 	 * Initialize any unspecified boot parameters.
-- 
2.31.1.189.g2e36527f23


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-05-11 23:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-11 23:07 [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/6] SRCU updates for v5.14 Paul E. McKenney
2021-05-11 23:07 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 1/6] srcu: Remove superfluous sdp->srcu_lock_count zero filling Paul E. McKenney
2021-05-11 23:07 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 2/6] srcu: Remove superfluous ssp initialization for early callbacks Paul E. McKenney
2021-05-11 23:07 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 3/6] srcu: Unconditionally embed struct lockdep_map Paul E. McKenney
2021-05-11 23:07 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 4/6] srcu: Initialize SRCU after timers Paul E. McKenney
2021-05-11 23:07 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2021-05-11 23:07 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 6/6] srcu: Early test SRCU polling start Paul E. McKenney
2021-05-11 23:09 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 1/4] rcu-tasks: Add block comment laying out RCU Tasks design Paul E. McKenney
2021-05-11 23:09 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 2/4] rcu-tasks: Add block comment laying out RCU Rude design Paul E. McKenney
2021-05-11 23:09 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 3/4] rcu-tasks: Make ksoftirqd provide RCU Tasks quiescent states Paul E. McKenney
2021-05-11 23:09 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 4/4] tasks-rcu: Make show_rcu_tasks_gp_kthreads() be static inline Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210511230745.2894650-5-paulmck@kernel.org \
    --to=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=neeraju@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=urezki@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.