All the mail mirrored from lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com>
To: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, glider@google.com, dvyukov@google.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kfence: use TASK_IDLE when awaiting allocation
Date: Fri, 21 May 2021 17:37:15 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210521093715.1813-1-hdanton@sina.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210521083209.3740269-1-elver@google.com>

On Fri, 21 May 2021 10:32:09 +0200 Marco Elver wrote:
>Since wait_event() uses TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE by default, waiting for an
>allocation counts towards load. However, for KFENCE, this does not make
>any sense, since there is no busy work we're awaiting.

Because of a blocking wq callback, kfence_timer should be queued on a
unbound workqueue in the first place. Feel free to add a followup to
replace system_power_efficient_wq with system_unbound_wq if it makes
sense to you that kfence behaves as correctly as expected independent of
CONFIG_WQ_POWER_EFFICIENT_DEFAULT given "system_power_efficient_wq is
identical to system_wq if 'wq_power_efficient' is disabled."


  reply	other threads:[~2021-05-21  9:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-21  8:32 [PATCH] kfence: use TASK_IDLE when awaiting allocation Marco Elver
2021-05-21  9:37 ` Hillf Danton [this message]
2021-05-21 11:17   ` Marco Elver
2021-05-21  9:39 ` David Laight
2021-05-21  9:47   ` Marco Elver
2021-05-21 10:15     ` David Laight
2021-06-07 14:23 ` [5.12.y] " Marco Elver
2021-06-08 13:21   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210521093715.1813-1-hdanton@sina.com \
    --to=hdanton@sina.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dvyukov@google.com \
    --cc=elver@google.com \
    --cc=glider@google.com \
    --cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.