From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29C84C4338F for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 14:13:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0ACAF6101C for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 14:13:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231247AbhG3OND (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Jul 2021 10:13:03 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:36426 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S238962AbhG3ONB (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Jul 2021 10:13:01 -0400 Received: from mail-ed1-x529.google.com (mail-ed1-x529.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::529]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E4A6C06175F for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 07:12:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ed1-x529.google.com with SMTP id b7so13410995edu.3 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 07:12:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=essensium.com; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=Hd2q/X7BgErZISBj09E78buxul4qCIZMXvIYYh7cfM0=; b=JqwuPberCHRFOiHTIIQDQ2EjHcU8GPjL41bd0AwGKMq/R9Ucva+bqpj1rNGiJ8dV49 kXFctmVUBMNbm9BTWU08Nu+QU8XhEOZ2WRuFiJ1GcQwkz3Z00n54bTnFG1pSpvpAVUmf 79GZfTLq9GqvshJVV1U3YtPXLUGENd4ksttH7DSZE7nN/q9NctVL59OU0GYupBjDNr3i okFnRGJJSW3KT25f7ffO3ffUhpDwrrudQokh5bYtNemp5bt3ITHfpOguyYq+iZD1emvq m6TytdpoBS4BWIW7O/PvEKbIPEUi2UetAtv1mzgMKkJIOqzzC8nhwEqBshZ3KxSo9INf zIgg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=Hd2q/X7BgErZISBj09E78buxul4qCIZMXvIYYh7cfM0=; b=Y5lllKYjV31VGnX5e4aw7lnCM+Vfo2SPeFM7w16uQi0/5OTljLCWFqOveTkARvPXqd E7kh3z57B6bfY2Wxl0pHbqhyUwdGjSp4I2Fm3hoR1bEvcJN98jVhWPdWif08/DXhwXGs qg+9tuIWIPh3zgp9NKsj6tPvc3auRF+KdB/LnFncwXWZJ2soZZzghA/gUojhebD+PYVu hrvEMb3pZdZKdXDS1lqeUYORMfE1uObcDzjsjL0LLjUAB3Cm+f3C0aFq7iG7oCz2ViUJ nTKrG7K8rM3wyxhw4lFGtWYTF9bTUXIHQtB7vOzVqystTaOYY+S+SQJL6/a/p5Bb+tOo vaBg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530C/84ayG+g2KMwzuIhsIOBKQ/vJ3C3385uPVXiiH2zkkpF1bPZ dFOpJ77ZQkF62kn4x+P4D5UIgYPnbatR5w== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxlL7xvje6SPwO4tbxx5EMbjLbCQpzvYj4PR+ByWtoucfKUNknugQU1BRFTrRD559EKhEkP4g== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:4c5:: with SMTP id n5mr3172602edw.322.1627654372775; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 07:12:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cephalopod (168.7-181-91.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be. [91.181.7.168]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l17sm760165edt.52.2021.07.30.07.12.52 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 30 Jul 2021 07:12:52 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2021 16:12:50 +0200 From: Ben Hutchings To: Bartosz Golaszewski Cc: "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" Subject: Re: [PATCH libgpiod-v2] gpiomon: Fix format specifier for uint64_t Message-ID: <20210730141249.GA28359@cephalopod> References: <20210728131327.GA14442@cephalopod> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 04:34:19PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: [...] > Hi Ben! > > This and the other patches are great, thanks! > > I assume they are rebases on top of the next/libpiod-2.0 branch? That's right. > I > want the git repo for libgpiod to remain bisectable and intend to > switch to the new API in one big patch including the core API, C++ and > Python bindings as well as test suites. I will keep your patches in my > queue and apply them once the patch is in master - unless you don't > care that much about authorship of the patches in which case I can > squash them into the big patch and credit you in the commit message. > Let me know what works best for you. Please squash this one into the big patch (as it fixes a regression in that) and apply the others separately. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings · Senior Embedded Software Engineer, Essensium-Mind · mind.be