From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: kbuild-all@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v7 4/4] arm64: Create a list of SYM_CODE functions, check return PC against list
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2021 02:53:35 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202108130221.5ahRlEbx-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210812132435.6143-5-madvenka@linux.microsoft.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2546 bytes --]
Hi,
[FYI, it's a private test report for your RFC patch.]
[auto build test WARNING on v5.14-rc5]
[also build test WARNING on next-20210812]
[cannot apply to arm64/for-next/core tip/perf/core]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]
url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/madvenka-linux-microsoft-com/arm64-Make-all-stack-walking-functions-use-arch_stack_walk/20210812-222448
base: 36a21d51725af2ce0700c6ebcb6b9594aac658a6
config: arm64-allyesconfig (attached as .config)
compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 10.3.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
# https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/fcc398e417dd1c8521e069b516322c5e5f615444
git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux
git fetch --no-tags linux-review madvenka-linux-microsoft-com/arm64-Make-all-stack-walking-functions-use-arch_stack_walk/20210812-222448
git checkout fcc398e417dd1c8521e069b516322c5e5f615444
# save the attached .config to linux build tree
COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-10.3.0 make.cross ARCH=arm64
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
>> arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c:29:12: warning: no previous prototype for 'init_sym_code_functions' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
29 | int __init init_sym_code_functions(void)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
vim +/init_sym_code_functions +29 arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
28
> 29 int __init init_sym_code_functions(void)
30 {
31 size_t size = (unsigned long)__sym_code_functions_end -
32 (unsigned long)__sym_code_functions_start;
33
34 sym_code_functions = (struct code_range *)__sym_code_functions_start;
35 /*
36 * Order it so that sym_code_functions is not visible before
37 * num_sym_code_functions.
38 */
39 smp_mb();
40 num_sym_code_functions = size / sizeof(struct code_range);
41
42 return 0;
43 }
44 early_initcall(init_sym_code_functions);
45
---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all(a)lists.01.org
[-- Attachment #2: config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 77910 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-12 18:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <3f2aab69a35c243c5e97f47c4ad84046355f5b90>
2021-06-30 22:33 ` [RFC PATCH v6 0/3] arm64: Implement stack trace reliability checks madvenka
2021-06-30 22:33 ` madvenka
2021-06-30 22:33 ` [RFC PATCH v6 1/3] arm64: Improve the unwinder return value madvenka
2021-06-30 22:33 ` madvenka
2021-07-28 16:56 ` Mark Rutland
2021-07-28 16:56 ` Mark Rutland
2021-07-29 13:54 ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2021-07-29 13:54 ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2021-06-30 22:33 ` [RFC PATCH v6 2/3] arm64: Introduce stack trace reliability checks in the unwinder madvenka
2021-06-30 22:33 ` madvenka
2021-06-30 22:33 ` [RFC PATCH v6 3/3] arm64: Create a list of SYM_CODE functions, check return PC against list madvenka
2021-06-30 22:33 ` madvenka
2021-07-28 17:25 ` Mark Rutland
2021-07-28 17:25 ` Mark Rutland
2021-07-29 14:06 ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2021-07-29 14:06 ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2021-07-29 14:52 ` Mark Brown
2021-07-29 14:52 ` Mark Brown
2021-07-29 17:07 ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2021-07-29 17:07 ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2021-07-29 15:48 ` Mark Rutland
2021-07-29 15:48 ` Mark Rutland
2021-07-29 16:27 ` Mark Brown
2021-07-29 16:27 ` Mark Brown
2021-07-29 17:09 ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2021-07-29 17:09 ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2021-07-26 13:49 ` [RFC PATCH v6 0/3] arm64: Implement stack trace reliability checks Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2021-07-26 13:49 ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2021-08-12 13:24 ` [RFC PATCH v7 0/4] arm64: Reorganize the unwinder and implement " madvenka
2021-08-12 13:24 ` madvenka
2021-08-12 13:24 ` [RFC PATCH v7 1/4] arm64: Make all stack walking functions use arch_stack_walk() madvenka
2021-08-12 13:24 ` madvenka
2021-08-12 15:23 ` Mark Brown
2021-08-12 15:23 ` Mark Brown
2021-08-12 16:30 ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2021-08-12 16:30 ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2021-08-12 20:59 ` kernel test robot
2021-08-12 13:24 ` [RFC PATCH v7 2/4] arm64: Reorganize the unwinder code for better consistency and maintenance madvenka
2021-08-12 13:24 ` madvenka
2021-08-12 13:24 ` [RFC PATCH v7 3/4] arm64: Introduce stack trace reliability checks in the unwinder madvenka
2021-08-12 13:24 ` madvenka
2021-08-12 13:24 ` [RFC PATCH v7 4/4] arm64: Create a list of SYM_CODE functions, check return PC against list madvenka
2021-08-12 13:24 ` madvenka
2021-08-12 18:53 ` kernel test robot [this message]
2021-08-12 18:31 ` [RFC PATCH v7 0/4] arm64: Reorganize the unwinder and implement stack trace reliability checks Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2021-08-12 18:31 ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2021-08-12 18:45 ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2021-08-12 18:45 ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2021-08-12 18:35 ` madvenka
2021-08-12 18:35 ` madvenka
2021-08-12 18:35 ` [RFC PATCH v7 1/4] arm64: Make all stack walking functions use arch_stack_walk() madvenka
2021-08-12 18:35 ` madvenka
2021-08-12 18:35 ` [RFC PATCH v7 2/4] arm64: Reorganize the unwinder code for better consistency and maintenance madvenka
2021-08-12 18:35 ` madvenka
2021-08-12 18:35 ` [RFC PATCH v7 3/4] arm64: Introduce stack trace reliability checks in the unwinder madvenka
2021-08-12 18:35 ` madvenka
2021-08-12 18:35 ` [RFC PATCH v7 4/4] arm64: Create a list of SYM_CODE functions, check return PC against list madvenka
2021-08-12 18:35 ` madvenka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202108130221.5ahRlEbx-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=kbuild-all@lists.01.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.