All the mail mirrored from lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH V2 0/1] loop: introduce LO_FLAGS_NO_DEALLOC
@ 2022-08-06 15:30 Zhang Boyang
  2022-08-06 15:30 ` [PATCH V2 1/1] " Zhang Boyang
  2022-08-11 11:40 ` Userspace support for LO_FLAGS_NO_DEALLOC (Re: [PATCH V2 0/1] loop: introduce LO_FLAGS_NO_DEALLOC) Zhang Boyang
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Zhang Boyang @ 2022-08-06 15:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jens Axboe, Christoph Hellwig, linux-block
  Cc: Tetsuo Handa, Jan Kara, Ming Lei, Darrick J . Wong,
	Chaitanya Kulkarni, Damien Le Moal, Martin K . Petersen,
	linux-kernel

Hi,

This patch gives userspace ability to prevent underlying file of loop
device to be sparse. Currently, if loop device is 'trimmed'
(BLKDISCARD), then underlying file will always become sparse and disk
space freed. This behaviour is good for thin provisioning but not good
for preallocated disk images. This patch introduces LO_FLAGS_NO_DEALLOC
flag, which will write zeroes to underlying file instead of punching
holes when BLKDISCARD is requested. Thus reducing file fragmentation of
preallocated disk images and improve performance.

I will also submit patches to util-linux to provide userspace support if
this patch is merged.

Changes in V1->V2:
Renamed NODEALLOC to NO_DEALLOC, to avoid confusion between NO_DEALLOC
and NODE_ALLOC. Suggested by Jens Axboe.

Best Regards,
Zhang Boyang 



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [PATCH V2 1/1] loop: introduce LO_FLAGS_NO_DEALLOC
  2022-08-06 15:30 [PATCH V2 0/1] loop: introduce LO_FLAGS_NO_DEALLOC Zhang Boyang
@ 2022-08-06 15:30 ` Zhang Boyang
  2022-08-09 22:19   ` Darrick J. Wong
  2022-08-11 11:40 ` Userspace support for LO_FLAGS_NO_DEALLOC (Re: [PATCH V2 0/1] loop: introduce LO_FLAGS_NO_DEALLOC) Zhang Boyang
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Zhang Boyang @ 2022-08-06 15:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jens Axboe, Christoph Hellwig, linux-block
  Cc: Tetsuo Handa, Jan Kara, Ming Lei, Darrick J . Wong,
	Chaitanya Kulkarni, Damien Le Moal, Martin K . Petersen,
	linux-kernel, Zhang Boyang

Previously, for file-backed loop devices, REQ_OP_DISCARD and
REQ_OP_WRITE_ZEROES (without REQ_NOUNMAP) are implemented using
fallocate(FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE), which will cause the underlying file to
be sparse and disk space freed. The users have no choice to prevent this
this from happening.

This patch introduces LO_FLAGS_NO_DEALLOC. With this flag set,
REQ_OP_DISCARD and REQ_OP_WRITE_ZEROES are forced to use
fallocate(FALLOC_FL_ZERO_RANGE). The disk space of underlying file is
kept allocated. This is useful if users, for example, want to use a
preallocated file as the backing file.

Signed-off-by: Zhang Boyang <zhangboyang.id@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/block/loop.c      | 17 +++++++++++++++--
 include/uapi/linux/loop.h | 15 +++++++++++----
 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/block/loop.c b/drivers/block/loop.c
index 084f9b8a0ba3..36bd9906a154 100644
--- a/drivers/block/loop.c
+++ b/drivers/block/loop.c
@@ -483,11 +483,15 @@ static int do_req_filebacked(struct loop_device *lo, struct request *rq)
 		 * write zeroes the range.  Otherwise, punch them out.
 		 */
 		return lo_fallocate(lo, rq, pos,
-			(rq->cmd_flags & REQ_NOUNMAP) ?
+			((rq->cmd_flags & REQ_NOUNMAP) ||
+			 (lo->lo_flags & LO_FLAGS_NO_DEALLOC)) ?
 				FALLOC_FL_ZERO_RANGE :
 				FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE);
 	case REQ_OP_DISCARD:
-		return lo_fallocate(lo, rq, pos, FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE);
+		return lo_fallocate(lo, rq, pos,
+			(lo->lo_flags & LO_FLAGS_NO_DEALLOC) ?
+				FALLOC_FL_ZERO_RANGE :
+				FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE);
 	case REQ_OP_WRITE:
 		if (cmd->use_aio)
 			return lo_rw_aio(lo, cmd, pos, WRITE);
@@ -719,12 +723,20 @@ static ssize_t loop_attr_dio_show(struct loop_device *lo, char *buf)
 	return sysfs_emit(buf, "%s\n", dio ? "1" : "0");
 }
 
+static ssize_t loop_attr_no_dealloc_show(struct loop_device *lo, char *buf)
+{
+	int no_dealloc = (lo->lo_flags & LO_FLAGS_NO_DEALLOC);
+
+	return sysfs_emit(buf, "%s\n", no_dealloc ? "1" : "0");
+}
+
 LOOP_ATTR_RO(backing_file);
 LOOP_ATTR_RO(offset);
 LOOP_ATTR_RO(sizelimit);
 LOOP_ATTR_RO(autoclear);
 LOOP_ATTR_RO(partscan);
 LOOP_ATTR_RO(dio);
+LOOP_ATTR_RO(no_dealloc);
 
 static struct attribute *loop_attrs[] = {
 	&loop_attr_backing_file.attr,
@@ -733,6 +745,7 @@ static struct attribute *loop_attrs[] = {
 	&loop_attr_autoclear.attr,
 	&loop_attr_partscan.attr,
 	&loop_attr_dio.attr,
+	&loop_attr_no_dealloc.attr,
 	NULL,
 };
 
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/loop.h b/include/uapi/linux/loop.h
index 6f63527dd2ed..91a0a8b1f298 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/loop.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/loop.h
@@ -18,17 +18,24 @@ enum {
 	LO_FLAGS_AUTOCLEAR	= 4,
 	LO_FLAGS_PARTSCAN	= 8,
 	LO_FLAGS_DIRECT_IO	= 16,
+	LO_FLAGS_NO_DEALLOC	= 32,
 };
 
 /* LO_FLAGS that can be set using LOOP_SET_STATUS(64) */
-#define LOOP_SET_STATUS_SETTABLE_FLAGS (LO_FLAGS_AUTOCLEAR | LO_FLAGS_PARTSCAN)
+#define LOOP_SET_STATUS_SETTABLE_FLAGS (LO_FLAGS_AUTOCLEAR		\
+					| LO_FLAGS_PARTSCAN		\
+					| LO_FLAGS_NO_DEALLOC)
 
 /* LO_FLAGS that can be cleared using LOOP_SET_STATUS(64) */
-#define LOOP_SET_STATUS_CLEARABLE_FLAGS (LO_FLAGS_AUTOCLEAR)
+#define LOOP_SET_STATUS_CLEARABLE_FLAGS (LO_FLAGS_AUTOCLEAR		\
+					 | LO_FLAGS_NO_DEALLOC)
 
 /* LO_FLAGS that can be set using LOOP_CONFIGURE */
-#define LOOP_CONFIGURE_SETTABLE_FLAGS (LO_FLAGS_READ_ONLY | LO_FLAGS_AUTOCLEAR \
-				       | LO_FLAGS_PARTSCAN | LO_FLAGS_DIRECT_IO)
+#define LOOP_CONFIGURE_SETTABLE_FLAGS (LO_FLAGS_READ_ONLY		\
+				       | LO_FLAGS_AUTOCLEAR		\
+				       | LO_FLAGS_PARTSCAN		\
+				       | LO_FLAGS_DIRECT_IO		\
+				       | LO_FLAGS_NO_DEALLOC)
 
 #include <asm/posix_types.h>	/* for __kernel_old_dev_t */
 #include <linux/types.h>	/* for __u64 */
-- 
2.30.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH V2 1/1] loop: introduce LO_FLAGS_NO_DEALLOC
  2022-08-06 15:30 ` [PATCH V2 1/1] " Zhang Boyang
@ 2022-08-09 22:19   ` Darrick J. Wong
  2022-08-10 11:00     ` Zhang Boyang
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Darrick J. Wong @ 2022-08-09 22:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Zhang Boyang
  Cc: Jens Axboe, Christoph Hellwig, linux-block, Tetsuo Handa,
	Jan Kara, Ming Lei, Chaitanya Kulkarni, Damien Le Moal,
	Martin K . Petersen, linux-kernel

On Sat, Aug 06, 2022 at 11:30:22PM +0800, Zhang Boyang wrote:
> Previously, for file-backed loop devices, REQ_OP_DISCARD and
> REQ_OP_WRITE_ZEROES (without REQ_NOUNMAP) are implemented using
> fallocate(FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE), which will cause the underlying file to
> be sparse and disk space freed. The users have no choice to prevent this
> this from happening.
> 
> This patch introduces LO_FLAGS_NO_DEALLOC. With this flag set,
> REQ_OP_DISCARD and REQ_OP_WRITE_ZEROES are forced to use
> fallocate(FALLOC_FL_ZERO_RANGE). The disk space of underlying file is
> kept allocated. This is useful if users, for example, want to use a
> preallocated file as the backing file.

Considering that discard isn't required to do anything, why not
echo 0 | sudo tee /sys/block/loopX/queue/discard_max_bytes ?

--D

> Signed-off-by: Zhang Boyang <zhangboyang.id@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/block/loop.c      | 17 +++++++++++++++--
>  include/uapi/linux/loop.h | 15 +++++++++++----
>  2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/block/loop.c b/drivers/block/loop.c
> index 084f9b8a0ba3..36bd9906a154 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/loop.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/loop.c
> @@ -483,11 +483,15 @@ static int do_req_filebacked(struct loop_device *lo, struct request *rq)
>  		 * write zeroes the range.  Otherwise, punch them out.
>  		 */
>  		return lo_fallocate(lo, rq, pos,
> -			(rq->cmd_flags & REQ_NOUNMAP) ?
> +			((rq->cmd_flags & REQ_NOUNMAP) ||
> +			 (lo->lo_flags & LO_FLAGS_NO_DEALLOC)) ?
>  				FALLOC_FL_ZERO_RANGE :
>  				FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE);
>  	case REQ_OP_DISCARD:
> -		return lo_fallocate(lo, rq, pos, FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE);
> +		return lo_fallocate(lo, rq, pos,
> +			(lo->lo_flags & LO_FLAGS_NO_DEALLOC) ?
> +				FALLOC_FL_ZERO_RANGE :
> +				FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE);
>  	case REQ_OP_WRITE:
>  		if (cmd->use_aio)
>  			return lo_rw_aio(lo, cmd, pos, WRITE);
> @@ -719,12 +723,20 @@ static ssize_t loop_attr_dio_show(struct loop_device *lo, char *buf)
>  	return sysfs_emit(buf, "%s\n", dio ? "1" : "0");
>  }
>  
> +static ssize_t loop_attr_no_dealloc_show(struct loop_device *lo, char *buf)
> +{
> +	int no_dealloc = (lo->lo_flags & LO_FLAGS_NO_DEALLOC);
> +
> +	return sysfs_emit(buf, "%s\n", no_dealloc ? "1" : "0");
> +}
> +
>  LOOP_ATTR_RO(backing_file);
>  LOOP_ATTR_RO(offset);
>  LOOP_ATTR_RO(sizelimit);
>  LOOP_ATTR_RO(autoclear);
>  LOOP_ATTR_RO(partscan);
>  LOOP_ATTR_RO(dio);
> +LOOP_ATTR_RO(no_dealloc);
>  
>  static struct attribute *loop_attrs[] = {
>  	&loop_attr_backing_file.attr,
> @@ -733,6 +745,7 @@ static struct attribute *loop_attrs[] = {
>  	&loop_attr_autoclear.attr,
>  	&loop_attr_partscan.attr,
>  	&loop_attr_dio.attr,
> +	&loop_attr_no_dealloc.attr,
>  	NULL,
>  };
>  
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/loop.h b/include/uapi/linux/loop.h
> index 6f63527dd2ed..91a0a8b1f298 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/loop.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/loop.h
> @@ -18,17 +18,24 @@ enum {
>  	LO_FLAGS_AUTOCLEAR	= 4,
>  	LO_FLAGS_PARTSCAN	= 8,
>  	LO_FLAGS_DIRECT_IO	= 16,
> +	LO_FLAGS_NO_DEALLOC	= 32,
>  };
>  
>  /* LO_FLAGS that can be set using LOOP_SET_STATUS(64) */
> -#define LOOP_SET_STATUS_SETTABLE_FLAGS (LO_FLAGS_AUTOCLEAR | LO_FLAGS_PARTSCAN)
> +#define LOOP_SET_STATUS_SETTABLE_FLAGS (LO_FLAGS_AUTOCLEAR		\
> +					| LO_FLAGS_PARTSCAN		\
> +					| LO_FLAGS_NO_DEALLOC)
>  
>  /* LO_FLAGS that can be cleared using LOOP_SET_STATUS(64) */
> -#define LOOP_SET_STATUS_CLEARABLE_FLAGS (LO_FLAGS_AUTOCLEAR)
> +#define LOOP_SET_STATUS_CLEARABLE_FLAGS (LO_FLAGS_AUTOCLEAR		\
> +					 | LO_FLAGS_NO_DEALLOC)
>  
>  /* LO_FLAGS that can be set using LOOP_CONFIGURE */
> -#define LOOP_CONFIGURE_SETTABLE_FLAGS (LO_FLAGS_READ_ONLY | LO_FLAGS_AUTOCLEAR \
> -				       | LO_FLAGS_PARTSCAN | LO_FLAGS_DIRECT_IO)
> +#define LOOP_CONFIGURE_SETTABLE_FLAGS (LO_FLAGS_READ_ONLY		\
> +				       | LO_FLAGS_AUTOCLEAR		\
> +				       | LO_FLAGS_PARTSCAN		\
> +				       | LO_FLAGS_DIRECT_IO		\
> +				       | LO_FLAGS_NO_DEALLOC)
>  
>  #include <asm/posix_types.h>	/* for __kernel_old_dev_t */
>  #include <linux/types.h>	/* for __u64 */
> -- 
> 2.30.2
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH V2 1/1] loop: introduce LO_FLAGS_NO_DEALLOC
  2022-08-09 22:19   ` Darrick J. Wong
@ 2022-08-10 11:00     ` Zhang Boyang
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Zhang Boyang @ 2022-08-10 11:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Darrick J. Wong
  Cc: Jens Axboe, Christoph Hellwig, linux-block, Tetsuo Handa,
	Jan Kara, Ming Lei, Chaitanya Kulkarni, Damien Le Moal,
	Martin K . Petersen, linux-kernel

Hi,

On 2022/8/10 06:19, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> 
> Considering that discard isn't required to do anything, why not
> echo 0 | sudo tee /sys/block/loopX/queue/discard_max_bytes ?
> 

Thanks for reviewing! This will disable discard completely (>=5.19), 
thus the filesystem of backing file has no knowledge about what can be 
freed. In contrast, my patch convert REQ_OP_DISCARD to 
FALLOC_FL_ZERO_RANGE, the discarded parts of backing file is flagged 
zeroed. So there is possibility for the filesystem of backing file to 
discard (trim) the zeroed range, improving the write performance on, for 
example, SSDs.

However, it seems only XFS with realtime discard enabled can do trim on 
FALLOC_FL_ZERO_RANGE. All other filesystems (and XFS without realtime 
discard) can't do trim on extents flagged zeroed. Batch discard like 
FITRIM (used by `fstirm' tool) also can't help here, because no 
filesystem track `allocated but flagged zeroed' extents at filesystem 
level. I will probably write another patch to add the ability to trim 
zeroed extents in single file to FITRIM. (Currently, FITRIM work on 
filesystem level, not file level)

Best Regards,
Zhang Boyang

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Userspace support for LO_FLAGS_NO_DEALLOC (Re: [PATCH V2 0/1] loop: introduce LO_FLAGS_NO_DEALLOC)
  2022-08-06 15:30 [PATCH V2 0/1] loop: introduce LO_FLAGS_NO_DEALLOC Zhang Boyang
  2022-08-06 15:30 ` [PATCH V2 1/1] " Zhang Boyang
@ 2022-08-11 11:40 ` Zhang Boyang
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Zhang Boyang @ 2022-08-11 11:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jens Axboe, Christoph Hellwig, Darrick J. Wong, linux-block
  Cc: Tetsuo Handa, Jan Kara, Ming Lei, Darrick J . Wong,
	Chaitanya Kulkarni, Damien Le Moal, Martin K . Petersen,
	linux-kernel

On 2022/8/6 23:30, Zhang Boyang wrote:
> I will also submit patches to util-linux to provide userspace support if
> this patch is merged.

For anyone who want to test the LO_FLAGS_NO_DEALLOC feature, the 
userspace support patch for util-linux is done at 
https://github.com/zhangboyang/util-linux/tree/losetup-nodealloc-202207

Below is an example typescript. In the example, a 10G test file is 
created and used as backing file of /dev/loop0. Then the mkfs.ext4 will 
discard most blocks in /dev/loop0. As you can see in the output of `du' 
and `filefrag', the extents is not freed nor changed location, thus file 
fragmentation is avoided. (The filesystem of backing file is ext4. 
Things are different in XFS or Btrfs, they tend to allocate new extents 
elsewhere when doing FALLOC_FL_ZERO_RANGE.)

Best Regards,
Zhang Boyang


root@debian:~# fallocate -l 10G /data/test
root@debian:~# du -sh /data/test
11G	/data/test
root@debian:~# filefrag -v /data/test
Filesystem type is: ef53
File size of /data/test is 10737418240 (2621440 blocks of 4096 bytes)
  ext:     logical_offset:        physical_offset: length:   expected: 
flags:
    0:        0..   32767:   37715968..  37748735:  32768: 
unwritten
    1:    32768..  524287:   37781504..  38273023: 491520:   37748736: 
unwritten
    2:   524288.. 1015807:   38305792..  38797311: 491520:   38273024: 
unwritten
    3:  1015808.. 1507327:   38830080..  39321599: 491520:   38797312: 
unwritten
    4:  1507328.. 1998847:   39354368..  39845887: 491520:   39321600: 
unwritten
    5:  1998848.. 2490367:   39878656..  40370175: 491520:   39845888: 
unwritten
    6:  2490368.. 2621439:   40402944..  40534015: 131072:   40370176: 
last,unwritten,eof
/data/test: 7 extents found
root@debian:~# ./losetup -f --no-dealloc /data/test
root@debian:~# ./losetup
NAME       SIZELIMIT OFFSET AUTOCLEAR RO BACK-FILE  DIO NO-DEALLOC LOG-SEC
/dev/loop0         0      0         0  0 /data/test   0          1     512
root@debian:~# mkfs.ext4 /dev/loop0
mke2fs 1.46.2 (28-Feb-2021)
Discarding device blocks: done
Creating filesystem with 2621440 4k blocks and 655360 inodes
Filesystem UUID: 4abd9157-6e40-4842-bb33-e6807fc5c231
Superblock backups stored on blocks:
	32768, 98304, 163840, 229376, 294912, 819200, 884736, 1605632

Allocating group tables: done
Writing inode tables: done
Creating journal (16384 blocks): done
Writing superblocks and filesystem accounting information: done

root@debian:~# ./losetup -d /dev/loop0
root@debian:~# du -sh /data/test
11G	/data/test
root@debian:~# filefrag -v /data/test
Filesystem type is: ef53
File size of /data/test is 10737418240 (2621440 blocks of 4096 bytes)
  ext:     logical_offset:        physical_offset: length:   expected: 
flags:
    0:        0..    1027:   37715968..  37716995:   1028:
    1:     1028..    1042:   37716996..  37717010:     15: 
unwritten
    2:     1043..    1043:   37717011..  37717011:      1:
    3:     1044..    1058:   37717012..  37717026:     15: 
unwritten
    4:     1059..    1059:   37717027..  37717027:      1:
    5:     1060..    9250:   37717028..  37725218:   8191: 
unwritten
    6:     9251..    9256:   37725219..  37725224:      6:
    7:     9257..   32767:   37725225..  37748735:  23511: 
unwritten
    8:    32768..   32770:   37781504..  37781506:      3:   37748736:
    9:    32771..   98303:   37781507..  37847039:  65533: 
unwritten
   10:    98304..   98306:   37847040..  37847042:      3:
   11:    98307..  163839:   37847043..  37912575:  65533: 
unwritten
   12:   163840..  163842:   37912576..  37912578:      3:
   13:   163843..  229375:   37912579..  37978111:  65533: 
unwritten
   14:   229376..  229378:   37978112..  37978114:      3:
   15:   229379..  294911:   37978115..  38043647:  65533: 
unwritten
   16:   294912..  294914:   38043648..  38043650:      3:
   17:   294915..  524287:   38043651..  38273023: 229373: 
unwritten
   18:   524288..  524288:   38305792..  38305792:      1:   38273024:
   19:   524289..  819199:   38305793..  38600703: 294911: 
unwritten
   20:   819200..  819202:   38600704..  38600706:      3:
   21:   819203..  884735:   38600707..  38666239:  65533: 
unwritten
   22:   884736..  884738:   38666240..  38666242:      3:
   23:   884739.. 1015807:   38666243..  38797311: 131069: 
unwritten
   24:  1015808.. 1048575:   38830080..  38862847:  32768:   38797312: 
unwritten
   25:  1048576.. 1048577:   38862848..  38862849:      2:
   26:  1048578.. 1081343:   38862850..  38895615:  32766: 
unwritten
   27:  1081344.. 1081344:   38895616..  38895616:      1:
   28:  1081345.. 1507327:   38895617..  39321599: 425983: 
unwritten
   29:  1507328.. 1572863:   39354368..  39419903:  65536:   39321600: 
unwritten
   30:  1572864.. 1572864:   39419904..  39419904:      1:
   31:  1572865.. 1605631:   39419905..  39452671:  32767: 
unwritten
   32:  1605632.. 1605634:   39452672..  39452674:      3:
   33:  1605635.. 1998847:   39452675..  39845887: 393213: 
unwritten
   34:  1998848.. 2097151:   39878656..  39976959:  98304:   39845888: 
unwritten
   35:  2097152.. 2097152:   39976960..  39976960:      1:
   36:  2097153.. 2097166:   39976961..  39976974:     14: 
unwritten
   37:  2097167.. 2097167:   39976975..  39976975:      1:
   38:  2097168.. 2490367:   39976976..  40370175: 393200: 
unwritten
   39:  2490368.. 2621439:   40402944..  40534015: 131072:   40370176: 
last,unwritten,eof
/data/test: 7 extents found

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2022-08-11 11:41 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-08-06 15:30 [PATCH V2 0/1] loop: introduce LO_FLAGS_NO_DEALLOC Zhang Boyang
2022-08-06 15:30 ` [PATCH V2 1/1] " Zhang Boyang
2022-08-09 22:19   ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-08-10 11:00     ` Zhang Boyang
2022-08-11 11:40 ` Userspace support for LO_FLAGS_NO_DEALLOC (Re: [PATCH V2 0/1] loop: introduce LO_FLAGS_NO_DEALLOC) Zhang Boyang

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.